McCulloch vs Maryland Explained: US History Review

The video discusses the landmark Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland, which defined federalism in the U.S. It explains the establishment of the National Bank and Maryland's opposition, leading to a legal battle. The Supreme Court, led by John Marshall, ruled in favor of the National Bank, emphasizing federal power. Marshall's four arguments, including the necessary and proper clause, are explored.

What is the main significance of the McCulloch v. Maryland case?

• It abolished the National Bank.

• It defined the balance of power between federal and state governments.

• It established the first state bank.

• It was the first Supreme Court case.

Why did Maryland attempt to tax the National Bank?

• To support the federal government.

• To assert state power over federal institutions.

• To increase state revenue.

• To comply with federal law.

What was the outcome of the Supreme Court's decision in McCulloch v. Maryland?

• Maryland was allowed to tax the National Bank.

• The case was dismissed.

• The National Bank was upheld as constitutional.

• The National Bank was declared unconstitutional.

Which argument did John Marshall use to support the supremacy of federal law?

• The ultimate sovereignty of the states.

• The historical precedent of state banks.

• The 10th Amendment.

• The necessary and proper clause.

What does the necessary and proper clause allow Congress to do?

• Limit state powers.

• Expand its powers to execute delegated powers.

• Create new states.

• Override the Constitution.

According to John Marshall, who holds ultimate sovereignty?

• The states.

• The Supreme Court.

• The federal government.

• The people.

What is the significance of the implied powers argument?

• It allows Congress to interpret its powers broadly.

• It restricts the Supreme Court's role.

• It limits Congress's authority.

• It gives states more power.