Twitter Says Musk Knew All About the Bots

The transcript discusses the ongoing legal battle between Twitter and Elon Musk, focusing on Twitter's claim that Musk's arguments about spam bots are irrelevant. The judge must decide whether to fast-track the trial, with Twitter pushing for a September date and Musk advocating for February. The judge, affected by COVID, will conduct the hearing via Zoom. Experts suggest Twitter may have a stronger case due to Musk waiving due diligence on bots, but the outcome remains uncertain.

What is Elon Musk's main argument against Twitter in the legal battle?

• Twitter is overvalued.

• Twitter has too many spam and robot bots.

• Twitter's user base is declining.

• Twitter's management is incompetent.

Why does Twitter want to fast-track the trial?

• To avoid media attention.

• To quickly resolve the uncertainty affecting its stock value.

• To reduce legal costs.

• To prevent Musk from gathering more evidence.

How has the judge's COVID-19 diagnosis affected the hearing?

• The hearing was moved to a virtual format.

• The hearing was postponed indefinitely.

• The hearing was canceled.

• The hearing was moved to a different location.

What is Musk's argument for delaying the trial until February?

• He wants to wait for a new judge.

• He is waiting for a new legal team.

• He needs more time to gather evidence.

• He believes the case is too complex for a quick trial.

What do experts believe about the strength of Twitter's case?

• Twitter holds a stronger position because Musk waived due diligence.

• Twitter's case is strong because of public support.

• Twitter's case is weak due to internal conflicts.

• Twitter has a weaker case due to lack of evidence.