U.K.'s Johnson: No Laws Were Broken Over Apartment Refit

U.K.'s Johnson: No Laws Were Broken Over Apartment Refit

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript covers a parliamentary session where the Prime Minister is questioned about a donation by Lord Brownlow for refurbishing his flat. The Prime Minister insists he covered the costs and deflects by comparing past expenses. The opposition and public demand clear answers, citing legal obligations. The Prime Minister denies any wrongdoing and emphasizes other governmental priorities.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the amount Lord Brownlow was asked to donate for the refurbishment?

£500

£28,000

£58,000

£350,000

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the Prime Minister claim about the refurbishment costs?

He covered the costs himself.

The Labour Party paid for it.

It was a gift from a foreign government.

It was funded by taxpayers.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the opposition's main criticism of the Prime Minister in this section?

He is not answering questions directly.

He is cutting council tax.

He is focusing too much on economic recovery.

He is spending too much on the pandemic.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What must be declared in the Register of Ministers' interests?

Travel expenses

Gifts from family members

All personal expenses

Any donation over £500

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the Prime Minister emphasize as more important than the refurbishment issue?

The Prime Minister's personal life

The Labour Party's past expenses

The cost of wallpaper

The pandemic and economic recovery