America: Nationalism And Change 1818-1830 - Gibbons V Ogden 1824

America: Nationalism And Change 1818-1830 - Gibbons V Ogden 1824

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Other

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

In 1824, the Supreme Court's decision in Gibbons vs. Ogden defined federal powers over state laws, focusing on commercial shipping rights. The case highlighted the conflict between state-granted monopolies and federal licensing, leading to a ruling based on the Commerce and Supremacy Clauses. This decision established the precedence of federal law over state law, shaping the relationship between national and state governments.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main issue at the heart of the Gibbons vs. Ogden case?

The ability to declare war

The power to tax imports

The authority to regulate commercial shipping

The right to vote in federal elections

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who was granted a monopoly by the state of New York for steamboat operations?

John Marshall

Aaron Ogden

Robert Fulton

Thomas Gibbons

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What clause of the Constitution was central to the Gibbons vs. Ogden decision?

The Supremacy Clause

The Establishment Clause

The Equal Protection Clause

The Commerce Clause

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What principle did Chief Justice Marshall use to resolve the conflict between state and federal law?

The principle of judicial review

The principle of checks and balances

The principle of federalism

The Supremacy Clause

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What concern does the decision in Gibbons vs. Ogden raise about the role of the national government?

It shows the national government can declare war without congressional approval.

It indicates the national government can levy taxes without state consent.

It implies the national government can override the Bill of Rights.

It suggests the national government can act as a judge in its own disputes.