The Iron Lady: Margaret Thatcher with Charles Moore: A presidential role

The Iron Lady: Margaret Thatcher with Charles Moore: A presidential role

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies

11th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the extensive research and archival work conducted on Mrs. Hatcher's papers, including interviews with over 600 people. It highlights her unique governing style, which relied heavily on written documents and detailed scrutiny. The narrative also explores the transition of the British Prime Minister's role towards a more presidential style, while emphasizing the balance of leadership virtues and vices.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What prompted Mrs. Hatcher to initiate the research project?

She wanted to write a memoir.

She was refused an honorary degree by Oxford.

She was preparing for a new political campaign.

She wanted to donate her papers to a museum.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did Mrs. Hatcher's research project benefit from her connections?

She received financial support from the government.

She was provided with a dedicated office space.

She was able to access confidential government papers.

She was given a team of researchers.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was a key characteristic of Mrs. Hatcher's governance style?

She avoided parliamentary involvement.

She relied heavily on verbal communication.

She delegated most tasks to her team.

She governed primarily through written documents.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In what way did Mrs. Hatcher's leadership style resemble a presidential role?

She avoided detailed policy work.

She focused on large-scale public leadership.

She rarely engaged with the media.

She delegated all responsibilities to her ministers.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was a potential downside of Mrs. Hatcher's leadership approach?

She lacked a clear vision for the future.

She was often seen as too dictatorial.

Her colleagues felt she was too lenient.

Her leadership style was too passive.