TED-Ed: Ethical dilemma: Would you lie? | Sarah Stroud

The video explores a moral dilemma involving Carrie's chronic lateness and whether to lie about dinner time to ensure punctuality. It examines philosophical perspectives on lying, including Kant's absolutism and Mill's utilitarianism, and discusses the implications of paternalism and respect for autonomy. The video encourages viewers to consider the balance between potential happiness and guaranteed disrespect in decision-making.

What is the main concern about Carrie's behavior in the scenario?

• Carrie is often late.

• Carrie forgets appointments.

• Carrie is always early.

• Carrie dislikes Emerson.

According to Immanuel Kant, when is lying considered immoral?

• When it is done to protect someone.

• In all circumstances.

• When it is done for personal gain.

• Only when it causes harm.

What does John Stuart Mill's utilitarian perspective suggest about lying?

• Lying is only wrong if it is discovered.

• Lying is acceptable if it benefits the liar.

• Lying is acceptable if it increases happiness.

• Lying is always wrong.

What is paternalism in the context of the scenario?

• Allowing someone to make their own choices.

• Interfering with someone's choices for their benefit.

• Encouraging someone to be late.

• Forcing someone to lie.

Why might lying to Carrie be considered disrespectful?

• It shows a lack of concern for Emerson.

• It is a sign of friendship.

• It helps her be on time.

• It assumes she cannot make her own decisions.