Crash Course Statistics: Real World Applications

Crash Course Statistics: Real World Applications

Assessment

Interactive Video

Mathematics, History, Science

10th - 12th Grade

Easy

Created by

Lucas Foster

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

The video explores the use of statistics in courtroom decisions through three cases: Alfred Dreyfus, Sally Clark, and Jonathan Dorfman. It highlights statistical errors and assumptions that affected the outcomes, emphasizing the importance of understanding probability and considering multiple hypotheses. The video concludes with a call for skepticism towards statistical claims in legal contexts.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main focus of the course as it nears its end?

Introduction to machine learning

Statistics in the courtroom

Theoretical statistics

Basic probability concepts

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the key piece of evidence used against Alfred Dreyfus?

A video recording

An unsigned letter

A witness testimony

A signed confession

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main flaw in Bertillon's analysis in the Dreyfus case?

He assumed independence incorrectly

He used outdated statistical methods

He ignored key evidence

He overlapped the key twice

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What statistical error did Dr. Roy Meadow make in Sally Clark's trial?

He assumed events were independent

He used the wrong dataset

He miscalculated the mean

He ignored the standard deviation

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the Prosecutor's fallacy as demonstrated in Sally Clark's case?

Assuming guilt based on unlikely evidence

Ignoring all statistical evidence

Using outdated statistical methods

Assuming all events are dependent

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main accusation against Jonathan Dorfman?

Falsifying data

Cheating on a midterm

Plagiarism

Stealing exam papers

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why was the statistical evidence against Dorfman considered flawed?

It was based on a small sample size

It assumed independence incorrectly

It used incorrect formulas

It ignored the correct answers

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?