Eliminating 'Good' and 'Bad' from Our Vocabulary

The video argues against the use of 'good' and 'bad' in language, labeling them as vague and unhelpful. It suggests replacing them with more descriptive adjectives to enhance clarity and creativity in communication. The speaker envisions a world where these words are eliminated, leading to more honest and impactful interactions. The video concludes with a call to action to remove these words from our vocabulary.

What is the main argument against using the words 'good' and 'bad'?

• They are too complex.

• They are too vague and hinder creativity.

• They are too descriptive.

• They are too colorful.

What does the speaker suggest as a replacement for 'good' and 'bad'?

• Simple phrases.

• Numerical ratings.

• More complex words.

• Descriptive and sincere adjectives.

How does the speaker illustrate the ineffectiveness of 'good' and 'bad'?

• By using examples of historical events.

• By using examples of weather forecasts.

• By using examples of hair and medical scenarios.

• By using examples of food descriptions.

What does the speaker say about our reliance on 'good' and 'bad'?

• It makes us more creative.

• It makes us more precise.

• It makes us more honest.

• It makes us linguistic slobs.

What is the speaker's final appeal to the jury?

• To find 'good' and 'bad' guilty.

• To find 'good' and 'bad' innocent.

• To use 'good' and 'bad' more often.

• To ignore the argument.