Judicial System and Elections

Judicial System and Elections

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Education, Law

10th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Ethan Morris

FREE Resource

The video discusses flaws in the judicial system, particularly focusing on the issues with judicial elections and the need for scientific literacy among judges. It highlights how money can corrupt judicial elections, using the Massey Coal Company case as an example. The video suggests considering merit systems as alternatives to current election practices.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the main issues with electing judges according to the speaker?

It ensures impartiality.

It creates problems in the judicial system.

It increases scientific literacy.

It reduces corruption.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is scientific literacy important in the judiciary?

To reduce the number of criminal cases.

To improve public speaking skills.

To handle scientific evidence in cases.

To increase the number of judges.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does John Grisham's book 'The Appeal' highlight?

The benefits of judicial elections.

The role of money in influencing judicial outcomes.

The history of the judicial system.

The importance of scientific evidence.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How can moneyed interests affect judicial elections?

By reducing campaign costs.

By targeting judges for specific cases.

By ensuring fair trials.

By promoting scientific literacy.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which state experienced a famous case of financial influence in judicial elections?

California

Florida

Texas

West Virginia

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the Supreme Court's ruling in the West Virginia case?

The decision was reversed due to impropriety.

The case was dismissed.

The judge was promoted.

The decision was upheld.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the Supreme Court identify in the West Virginia case?

A need for more judges.

An appearance of impropriety.

A fair election process.

A lack of evidence.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?