Understanding Just War Theory and Its Implications

The video discusses the application of Just War theory during a conflict involving the invasion of a UN member country. Initially, the coalition successfully repelled the aggression, adhering to the principles of Just War by stopping after achieving their goal. However, subsequent actions, such as inciting a rebellion in Iraq without support, led to severe consequences, including mass murder by Saddam Hussein. This behavior resulted in a loss of trust, contributing to ongoing issues in Iraq post-2003.

What was the initial act that led to the coalition's response according to Just War theory?

• A trade embargo

• A diplomatic disagreement

• An invasion of a UN member country

• An economic sanction

According to Just War theory, what is the coalition supposed to do after repelling aggression?

• Overthrow the aggressive government

• Occupy the country

• Impose economic sanctions

• Stop further military actions

What was the coalition's action after stopping the invasion?

• They incited a rebellion

• They imposed a trade embargo

• They marched further into the country

• They withdrew all forces

What was the expectation of the rebels in Iraq after the coalition's actions?

• That they would receive military support

• That they would be overthrown

• That they would be left alone

• That they would be sanctioned

What was Saddam Hussein able to do after the coalition's inaction?

• Launch a counter-invasion

• Form a new government

• Negotiate peace

• Slaughter his own people

What long-term issue did the coalition's behavior in 1990 contribute to?

• Political stability

• Increased trade

• Loss of trust and confidence

• Economic prosperity