Understanding the War on Terror

The video discusses the misdiagnosis of the war on terror, often framed as Cold War II, which is counterproductive. This framing suggests a clash of ideologies, leading Muslims to perceive it as a war on Islam. Terrorism is seen as a tactic, not ideology-driven, and framing it as a criminal act could improve counterterrorism efforts and build common ground between Muslims and Americans.

What is the main issue with how the war on terror is currently framed?

• It is regarded as a historical event.

• It is viewed as a local conflict.

• It is considered a financial burden.

• It is seen as a battle of ideologies.

How do Muslims generally perceive terrorism?

• As a political movement.

• As a cultural tradition.

• As a tactic used by criminals.

• As a religious duty.

What is a consequence of framing the war on terror as a clash of ideologies?

• It strengthens international alliances.

• It leads to economic growth.

• It improves diplomatic relations.

• It creates the perception of a war on Islam.

What alternative framing does the speaker suggest for the war on terror?

• As a cultural exchange.

• As a historical reenactment.

• As a war against criminal acts.

• As a technological advancement.

What common ground do Muslims and Americans share according to the speaker?

• A love for sports.

• A rejection of terrorism.

• A preference for the same cuisine.

• A shared history.