Inquisitional vs. Adversarial Systems

Oliver and Riley discuss the differences between the adversarial and inquisitional legal systems. The adversarial system involves prosecution proving guilt before a neutral judge and jury, with lawyers playing a significant role. In contrast, the inquisitional system sees the judge actively investigating and controlling the trial process. The adversarial system is more favorable to defendants due to the role of skilled lawyers, while the inquisitional system is better for societal truth-seeking. The video concludes by summarizing the benefits of each system for different parties.

What is the primary role of the prosecution in the adversarial system?

• To investigate the crime

• To prove the defendant guilty

• To act as a neutral party

• To defend the accused

Who can ask questions but not investigate in the adversarial system?

• The defense lawyer

• The judge

• The jury

• The prosecution

In the inquisitional system, who conducts public investigations?

• The judge

• The defense lawyer

• The prosecution

• The jury

Which system involves the judge controlling police investigations?

• Inquisitional system

• Adversarial system

• Both systems

• Neither system

Which system is considered better for the defendant?

• Neither system

• Both systems

• Adversarial system

• Inquisitional system

What is the main focus of the inquisitional system?

• Justice

• Lawyer's performance

• Plea deals

• Truth