CONTRACT SHOWDOWN - PARTIES and AGREEMENT

CONTRACT SHOWDOWN - PARTIES and AGREEMENT

University

16 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Indian contract act 1982

Indian contract act 1982

University

20 Qs

VOIDABLE CONRACTS PART 2

VOIDABLE CONRACTS PART 2

University

12 Qs

Contract Act

Contract Act

University

20 Qs

CHAPTER 3: FORM OF CONTRACTS

CHAPTER 3: FORM OF CONTRACTS

University

20 Qs

Contracts Review

Contracts Review

University

18 Qs

Contract Law Quiz

Contract Law Quiz

University

15 Qs

Indian contracts Acts 1872

Indian contracts Acts 1872

University

20 Qs

Objects and Cause of contracts

Objects and Cause of contracts

University

15 Qs

CONTRACT SHOWDOWN - PARTIES and AGREEMENT

CONTRACT SHOWDOWN - PARTIES and AGREEMENT

Assessment

Quiz

Other

University

Easy

Created by

Daniel Sherwinter

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

16 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Jamie, age 17, signs a one-year lease for a small apartment in Boulder. After two months, she decides she doesn't want to live there and stops paying rent.

The contract is invalid because she is a minor.

The contract is valid to the extent of the reasonable value of housing because it's a necessary.

The contract is automatically void when signed by a minor.
The landlord can sue her parents for the unpaid rent.

Answer explanation

Housing is a 'necessary,' so even minors can be held liable for its reasonable value.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Sara promises to sell her horse to Alex for $2,000. Unknown to both, the horse had died the night before the contract was signed.

Either party can rescind the contract because there was a mutual mistake as to a basic assumption.

The contract is valid and enforceable.
The injured party cannot rescind the contract because mistakes are never grounds to void a contract.
The contract is automatically converted into a service contract.

Answer explanation

A mutual mistake about the existence of the subject matter makes the contract voidable.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

A tech company offers to hire Ben to design a website for $5,000. Ben replies: 'I accept only if you include three months of free maintenance.'
The contract is valid and enforceable as stated.

The contract is invalid because Ben's reply is a conditional acceptance, making it a counteroffer.

The injured party can rescind the contract.
This is a unilateral contract.

Answer explanation

A conditional acceptance is treated as a counteroffer under the mirror image rule.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

A business owner tells a buyer: 'This car has never been in an accident,' based on what the previous owner told him. Both genuinely believe it's true. The buyer later discovers the car was in an accident.

The injured party cannot rescind the contract.
The contract is invalid because of fraud.

The buyer can rescind the contract because of innocent misrepresentation.

The buyer must prove negligence to rescind.

Answer explanation

An innocent misrepresentation allows rescission if the false statement induced the contract.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Maya is intoxicated when she signs a contract to sell her valuable art collection. She sobers up the next day and realizes what she did.
The contract is valid and enforceable no matter what.
The injured party cannot rescind the contract.
The contract is automatically void without proof.

Maya can rescind the contract if she can prove she lacked capacity due to intoxication.

Answer explanation

If intoxication prevents understanding of the contract, it can be voidable upon proof.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Chris offers to sell his laptop for $500. Dana replies, 'I accept. Can you throw in the carrying case too?'
The contract is valid and enforceable for the laptop; the carrying case is a separate proposal.
The party can rescind the contract.
The contract is invalid because the acceptance added a term.
This creates a unilateral contract.

Answer explanation

A request, without making acceptance conditional, does not prevent contract formation.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

A landlord promises a tenant to repair the roof. The landlord sells the building to a buyer who becomes the new landlord. The roof leaks. The tenant sues the old landlord.
The contract is valid and enforceable against the old landlord.
The party can rescind the contract because of mutual mistake.
The contract is invalid against the old landlord because of lack of privity.
The tenant automatically becomes an assignee.

Answer explanation

Only parties in privity can enforce a contract unless an exception applies.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?