Aligning MEAL with Project Requirement

In a health project in Kabul, the project team develops indicators that are difficult to measure and not linked to the project’s objectives. What has gone wrong?

• The MEAL budget was overestimated

• MEAL tools were not digitized

• The MEAL system is not aligned with the project’s results framework

• Data collection was outsourced

In Bamyan, the MEAL officer is asked to measure the project’s impact on household nutrition, but the logframe only includes outputs related to training delivery. What should be done?

• Proceed with the impact evaluation

• Add the indicators without updating the logframe

• Recommend updating the MEAL plan to include outcome-level indicators

• Collect data and report it as anecdotal evidence

In a livelihoods project in Herat, donors request monthly updates, but the MEAL plan only schedules quarterly monitoring. What’s the best approach?

• Ignore the donor request

• Update the MEAL plan to reflect reporting needs

• Submit old reports monthly

• Conduct monitoring only at project end

In a WASH project in Kandahar, monitoring tools were developed without consulting the technical team. As a result, data collected is incomplete. What is the likely issue?

• Data collectors were not trained

• MEAL and project design are not aligned

• The budget was underutilized

• Beneficiaries did not cooperate

In Nangarhar, a team tracks only quantitative data for an education project, though the goal is to improve teaching quality. What is missing?

• Donor involvement

• Gender balance

• Qualitative indicators to capture quality aspects

• Monthly reporting

A food security project in Balkh includes a learning component, but MEAL reports focus only on outputs. What should the MEAL team do?

• Ignore learning until the project ends

• Create a standalone learning project

• Integrate reflective practices and lessons learned into regular reporting

• Only focus on baseline and endline data

In Helmand, community members say the MEAL questions don’t reflect their reality or the project goals. What should be done?

• Replace the community respondents

• Revise tools to align with project outcomes and local context

• Proceed with the current tools for consistency

• Focus only on donor requirements