The Nuclear Tourist

1. What is the primary reason the author visited Chernobyl?

• To study radiation levels
• To document wildlife in the area
• To experience nuclear tourism firsthand
• To investigate the political situation in Ukraine

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.6

CCSS.RI.11-12.6

CCSS.RI.8.9

CCSS.RL.11-12.6

CCSS.RL.9-10.6

2. According to the text, what unexpected development occurred in the exclusion zone after the disaster?

• The radiation levels increased dramatically
• The area became a thriving wildlife sanctuary
• Local residents built new settlements
• Tourism became the main industry

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.2

CCSS.RI.11-12.2

CCSS.RL.11-12.2

CCSS.RL.8.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

3. What observation does the author make about radiation levels during his visit?

• They were highest inside the abandoned buildings
• They were lower than levels on his transatlantic flight
• They exceeded safe exposure limits
• They were consistently dangerous throughout the zone

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.3

CCSS.RI.6.3

CCSS.RI.7.3

CCSS.RI.8.3

CCSS.RI.9-10.3

4. How does the text characterize Rosalia, the "returnee"?

• As someone fearful of radiation
• As a recent immigrant to the area
• As a resilient individual who survived multiple hardships
• As someone seeking attention from tourists

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.3

CCSS.RL.6.3

CCSS.RL.7.6

CCSS.RL.8.6

CCSS.RL.9-10.3

5. What unexpected comparison does the author make regarding radiation exposure?

• Between Chernobyl and Fukushima
• Between ground level and airplane radiation
• Between urban and rural radiation levels
• Between past and present radiation levels

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.6

CCSS.RI.11-12.6

CCSS.RL.11-12.6

CCSS.RL.8.6

CCSS.RL.9-10.6

6. What is described as the most significant current threat to wildlife in the exclusion zone?

• Radiation exposure
• Lack of food sources
• Poachers
• Environmental contamination

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.2

CCSS.RI.11-12.2

CCSS.RL.11-12.2

CCSS.RL.8.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

7. How does the author characterize the tour guide's attitude toward radiation hotspots?

• Extremely cautious and fearful
• Scientific and analytical
• Surprisingly casual and enthusiastic
• Deliberately misleading

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.6

CCSS.RI.11-12.6

CCSS.RI.8.9

CCSS.RL.11-12.6

CCSS.RL.9-10.6

8. What detail suggests the ongoing impact of the disaster?

• The construction of new housing
• The planned cleanup extending to 2065
• The increasing tourism industry
• The return of former residents

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.2

CCSS.RL.11-12.2

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

9. How does the text describe the current state of Pripyat?

• Under active reconstruction
• Slowly being reclaimed by nature
• Fully restored to its original state
• Converted into a museum

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.6.5

CCSS.RI.7.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

10. What unexpected aspect of the tour does the author note?

• The high cost of admission
• The strict safety protocols
• The relaxed safety measures
• The large number of tourists

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.3

CCSS.RI.6.3

CCSS.RI.7.3

CCSS.RI.8.3

CCSS.RI.9-10.3