Search Header Logo

QAP Quiz on Network Analysis

Authored by Xinwei Xu

Other

University

Used 3+ times

QAP Quiz on Network Analysis
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In QAPs and CUGs, why do we need a large sample of permuted networks to compare our observed network to?

to adequately represent the random null-distribution

to get a lower p-value

to get higher regression coefficients

to compute the Standard Error of the regression coefficients

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The intercept estimate of -1.860 represents

the baseline probability of a tie value to be 1

the baseline log-odds of a tie if all other independent variables are 0

the baseline probability of a tie value to be 0

the baseline log-odds of a tie if all other independent variables are 1

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

We find a "seniority sender" coefficient of -0.045 with p = .009. How can this result be interpreted?

We find no significant evidence for seniority of the sender (assuming significance level = 5%)

Lawyers higher in seniority are significantly less likely to ask others for advice than lawyers with lower seniority (assuming alpha = 5%)

Among lawyers asking for advice, 4.5% of the lawyers have a high level of seniority

Lawyers higher in seniority are significantly less likely to be asked for advice than lawyers with lower seniority (assuming alpha= 5%)

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Do we find support for hypothesis ``senior lawyers are less likely to receive advice'' at significance level = 5%?

No, the coefficient estimate is greater than 0

Yes, because the odds estimate is greater than 1

Yes, because the p-value is less than 0.05

No, because the p-value is greater than 0.05

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

We find a "same school" coefficient of 0.29 with p = .060. How can this result be interpreted?

We find no significant evidence (at alpha = 0.05) for school homophily

Among lawyers asking for advice, 29% of the lawyers went to the same school

Those who went to the same school are significantly more likely to ask each other for advice

lawyers have a 6% probability of having an advice tie if they went to the same school

6.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Do we find support for hypothesis ``lawyers are more likely to ask lawyers with whom they worked with for advice'' at significance level = 5%?

No, because the coefficient estimate is less than 0

Yes, because the odds estimate is greater than 1

Yes, because the p-value is less than 0.05

No, because the p-value is greater than 0.05

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What are the log-odds of a lawyer with level 1 seniority sending a tie to a lawyer with level 2 seniority from the same office (but not from the same school or with a work tie)?

-1.860 - 0.045 + 1*0.036 + 1.062 = - 0.807

-1.860 - 0.045 + 1*0.036 + 1.062 + 0.294 + 2.478 = 1.965

- 0.045 + 2*0.036 + 1.062 = 1.089

-1.860 - 0.045 + 2*0.036 + 1.062 =  - 0.771

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?