Discussion: Interpreting Research Findings

Discussion: Interpreting Research Findings

University

10 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Intro to Narrative Inquiry

Intro to Narrative Inquiry

University

10 Qs

Technical Report Writing

Technical Report Writing

University

14 Qs

Research Methodology

Research Methodology

University

15 Qs

Research 101

Research 101

University

11 Qs

Conclusion Quiz

Conclusion Quiz

University

10 Qs

Research Aptitude

Research Aptitude

University

10 Qs

RM-SLR SUMMER SCHOOL

RM-SLR SUMMER SCHOOL

University

10 Qs

MCQ Module 2

MCQ Module 2

University

10 Qs

Discussion: Interpreting Research Findings

Discussion: Interpreting Research Findings

Assessment

Quiz

Education

University

Easy

Created by

WILSON YONG

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary purpose of the Discussion section?

To summarize the methodology

To compare results with previous research and provide interpretation

To restate the Results section in a different way

To conclude the paper without interpretation

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The Discussion section should include new data that was not presented in the Results.

True

False

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following is the best way to begin the Discussion section?

By restating the entire Results section

By summarizing the key findings in one or two sentences before interpretation

By introducing new background literature

By immediately discussing limitations

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How should you compare your results to previous studies?

By citing relevant literature and explaining similarities or differences

By only citing studies that support your findings

By avoiding comparisons to keep the focus on your work

By listing multiple references without explanation

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a common mistake in the Discussion section?

Making claims that are not supported by data

Discussing unexpected findings

Acknowledging study limitations

Comparing results with previous research

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Speculative conclusions should be clearly labeled and limited in the Discussion section.

True

False

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How should study limitations be addressed?

By hiding them to avoid criticism

By acknowledging them honestly and suggesting how future research can improve

By blaming external factors for unexpected results

By stating that the study has no limitations

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?