
Gerrymandering and Congressional Redistricting
Authored by James Jiles
Social Studies
9th - 12th Grade
Used 5+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
5 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Every 10 years congressional redistricting occurs for which of the following reasons?
To assign members of the House of Representatives to new committees
To determine how many state legislators will be eligible to run for Congress
To reshape political districts to benefit one party over the other
To divide a state into new political districts after changes in population
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Political action committees make larger total contributions to House races than Senate races because
House members are more likely to vote the way the Political Action Committee wants
House members have more influence on legislation than the Senate
the entire house is up for election every two years
Senators are much wealthier than representatives
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which of the following statements about gerrymandering is true?
It has been banned by United States Supreme Court decisions beginning with Baker v Carr.
It can be used by a political party to draw boundary lines to control as many districts as possible.
It guarantees greater constituency control over elected representatives.
It was used traditionally to maintain urban control of the House of Representatives.
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
This case ruled that claims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny, meaning that any law that results in classification by race must have a compelling government interest, be narrowly tailored to meet that goal, and be the least restrictive means for achieving that interest.
McDonald v. Chicago
Shaw v. Reno
Gibbons v. Ogden
Baker v. Carr
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
This case established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on redistricting cases ending malapportionment in state legislative districts.
Shaw v. Reno
Gibbons v. Ogden
Baker v. Carr
McCulloch v. Maryland
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?