TED: The ethical dilemma of designer babies | Paul Knoepfler

The video explores the concept of designer babies, focusing on the potential of CRISPR technology to create genetically modified humans. It discusses the societal and ethical implications, highlighting the risks and potential consequences of such advancements. The speaker calls for regulation and increased public awareness to address these challenges.

In the hypothetical 2030 scenario, what is the main reason some parents choose not to genetically modify their children?

• They believe in natural evolution.

• They are concerned about potential health risks.

• They cannot afford the technology.

• They fear societal backlash.

What is CRISPR technology often compared to in terms of its functionality?

• A chemical reactor

• A digital computer

• A Swiss Army knife

• A medical scanner

What was a significant development in the field of genetic modification reported by researchers in China?

• The creation of a new species

• The first genetically modified human embryos

• A cure for genetic diseases

• A new method of cloning

What historical concept is being compared to the potential use of CRISPR technology?

• The Information Age

• Industrial Revolution

• Eugenics

• The Space Race

What is a potential risk of genetic modification mentioned in the context of individual health?

• Increased intelligence

• Longer lifespan

• Unintended health issues

• Enhanced physical abilities

How might governments potentially influence genetic modification practices?

• By banning all genetic research

• By funding only natural births

• By promoting genetic modifications to reduce healthcare costs

• By enforcing a single genetic standard

What societal trend could arise if designer babies become popular?

• A return to traditional values

• A decline in technological advancements

• A new form of social inequality

• A decrease in social media usage

What is the speaker's main recommendation regarding the creation of genetically modified humans?

• To ban it entirely

• To encourage widespread adoption

• To proceed with caution

• To allow it under strict regulations

Why does the speaker believe public engagement is crucial in the discussion of genetic modifications?

• To increase funding for research

• To speed up technological development

• To ensure diverse perspectives are considered

• To reduce government intervention

What is a potential consequence of not having a moratorium on genetic modifications?

• A decrease in scientific research

• The rapid spread of unregulated genetic modifications

• An increase in natural births

• A decline in public interest