Analyzing and Evaluating an Argument

What does it mean to "evaluate" an argument?

• I don't know

• to respond to the argument

• to decide whether it makes sense and is convincing

• to provide a counterargument 

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

What is a claim?

• A statement that something is true or is a fact

• A question about the author's background

• A summary of the text

• A list of sources.

When looking for differences in 2 texts, if the evidence is true in Text X, what must be false in Text Y?

• The author's name

• The main argument

• The supporting evidence

• The conclusion.

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.7

CCSS.RI.11-12.7

CCSS.RL.11-12.7

CCSS.RL.8.5

CCSS.RL.9-10.7

What is the purpose of analyzing argumentative texts for clear thesis, relevant supporting evidence, pertinent examples, and conclusion?

• To ignore the author's argument and focus only on personal opinions.

• To summarize the author's argument without analyzing the evidence.

• To criticize the author's argument without providing any evidence.

• To evaluate the effectiveness of the author's argument and the strength of their evidence.

How can an author's treatment of counter-arguments be analyzed within a text?

• By evaluating how the author addresses opposing viewpoints, including concessions and rebuttals.

• By ignoring any opposing viewpoints and only focusing on the author's argument.

• By assuming that the author's argument is the only valid perspective without considering any counter-arguments.

• By criticizing the author's argument without providing any evidence.

How can an author's use of rhetorical devices enhance the effectiveness of a text?

• By using rhetorical devices to confuse the reader and make the text more difficult to understand.

• By using rhetorical devices to make the text longer without adding any new information.

• By using rhetorical devices to add depth and complexity to the argument, making it more persuasive and engaging.

• By using rhetorical devices to ignore the main argument and focus on irrelevant details.

How can logical fallacies impact the effectiveness of speeches?

• They can enhance the credibility of the speaker by making the argument more complex.

• They can undermine the argument by making it seem illogical or misleading.

• They have no impact on the effectiveness of speeches.

• They can make the speech more entertaining by adding humor.

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

What is the role of logical fallacies in persuasive speeches?

• They are used to intentionally mislead the audience.

• They are used to make the speech more factual and evidence-based.

• They are often used unintentionally and can weaken the speaker's argument.

• They are used to make the speech more boring and uninteresting.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

What is the primary goal of analyzing an argument in a text?

• To summarize the text without critique

• To identify the author's main point and evaluate its validity

• To rewrite the text in simpler terms

• To find grammatical errors

Which of the following best describes a counterargument?

• A statement that supports the main argument

• An opposing viewpoint that challenges the main argument

• A summary of the main argument

• An unrelated point