Supreme Court Cases

Supreme Court Cases

12th Grade

15 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Hereford U.S. Government Vocabulary/Spelling Week I

Hereford U.S. Government Vocabulary/Spelling Week I

5th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Serial Ep.1-5 Review

Serial Ep.1-5 Review

12th Grade

15 Qs

I Dissent: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

I Dissent: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

7th Grade - University

15 Qs

ACT Punctuation

ACT Punctuation

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

University - Professional Development

11 Qs

ESOL Citizenship vocabulary (Part 2)

ESOL Citizenship vocabulary (Part 2)

3rd - 12th Grade

16 Qs

IR2 Unit 5 The Weather Goes to Court: Forensic Meteorology

IR2 Unit 5 The Weather Goes to Court: Forensic Meteorology

University

10 Qs

ENGLISH LAW

ENGLISH LAW

University

15 Qs

Supreme Court Cases

Supreme Court Cases

Assessment

Quiz

English

12th Grade

Hard

CCSS
RI.8.1, RI.11-12.7, RI.11-12.4

+22

Standards-aligned

Created by

Sarah Williams

FREE Resource

15 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Education Law: the highest court that reviews rulings for a last resort of justice

Opinion

Plaintiff

Statute

Superior Court

Supreme Court

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Tinker v. Des Moines: The Des Moines Independent School District was the ___ in this case.

Plaintiff(s)

Defendant(s)

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Tinker v. Des Moines: John Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker, and Christopher Eckhardt were the ___ in this case.

Plaintiff(s)

Defendant(s)

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Tinker v. Des Moines: "conduct that conveys a message" is known as...

Tinker Test

Substantial disruption

Symbolic speech

First Amendment

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Tinker v. Des Moines: the guideline courts use to determine what school officials can and

cannot prohibit

Tinker Test

Substantial disruption

Symbolic speech

First Amendment

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.7

CCSS.RI.9-10.7

CCSS.RL.11-12.7

CCSS.RL.8.7

CCSS.RL.9-10.7

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

In paragraph 3 of the opinion, Chief Justice Warren summarizes the

nature and history of the cases being heard

arguments for and against hearing the cases.

history of Court rulings related to the Fourteenth Amendment.

deliberations of the justices with regard to the merits of the cases.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

According to paragraph 4 of the opinion, what reason did the plaintiffs give for wanting their cases heard before the Supreme Court?

Segregated schools needed to be made equal.

Segregated schools were not equal and could not be made equal.

Segregated schools offered equal education but not equal rights.

Segregated schools guaranteed them equal protection of the laws.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?