Understanding the Philosophy of Evolution and Art

What does the speaker believe about human evolution?

• It is a rapid process.

• It involves a slow ascent from primitive origins.

• It is a myth.

• It is irrelevant to their work.

What philosophical stance does the speaker hold regarding evolution?

• A modernist view.

• A postmodernist view.

• A traditionalist view.

• A nihilistic view.

How does the speaker aim to make their work universally understandable?

• By ignoring cultural differences.

• By using a language that everyone can understand.

• By using complex language.

• By focusing only on one culture.

Why does the speaker believe their work has different values in different cultures?

• Because it is not universally understandable.

• Because it has a distinct patina and value in each culture.

• Because it is only relevant to one culture.

• Because it is not influenced by any culture.

What challenge does the speaker face when simplifying their work?

• It becomes culturally specific.

• It loses its artistic value.

• It may lead to banality.

• It becomes too complex.

What is the 'drawing part' of the speaker's work related to?

• Technology and innovation.

• Nature and landscapes.

• Architecture and repetitive building techniques.

• Music and rhythm.

What elements does the speaker connect their work to?

• Music and dance.

• Architecture and personal elements.

• Technology and innovation.

• Nature and wildlife.

How does the speaker describe the surface and treatment of their work?

• As digital and virtual.

• As abstract and conceptual.

• As impersonal and machine-made.

• As personal and handmade.

What does the speaker emphasize about the creation of their work?

• It is outsourced to other artists.

• It shows human labor and dedication.

• It is created by machines.

• It is mass-produced.

What does the speaker aim to reflect in their work?

• The evolution of one person.

• The evolution of technology.

• The evolution of society.

• The evolution of nature.