Kritik Film dan Perubahan Iklim

Kritik Film dan Perubahan Iklim

12th Grade

25 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Writing a Reaction Paper, Review, and Critique_Test 5

Writing a Reaction Paper, Review, and Critique_Test 5

11th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Vocabulary

Vocabulary

12th Grade

21 Qs

Film Vocabulary Quiz

Film Vocabulary Quiz

8th Grade - University

20 Qs

The Great Gatsby Chapters 1-2

The Great Gatsby Chapters 1-2

11th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Gatsby Chapter 6

Gatsby Chapter 6

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

The Great Gatsby (2013) - Movie Quiz

The Great Gatsby (2013) - Movie Quiz

8th Grade - University

20 Qs

Gatsby Chapters 5-6

Gatsby Chapters 5-6

10th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Gatsby

Gatsby

10th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Kritik Film dan Perubahan Iklim

Kritik Film dan Perubahan Iklim

Assessment

Quiz

English

12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Khristanto Indrianto

FREE Resource

25 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The Great Gatsby (2013): A Review Roundup

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" by Baz Luhrmann sparked a variety of reactions, ranging from enthusiastic praise to mixed reviews. Here's a summary of different perspectives:

Positive Reviews:

●     Visuals and Soundtrack: Many reviewers were impressed by the film's aesthetic, praising the lavish sets, costumes, and energetic soundtrack. Some felt it captured the decadence and excitement of the Roaring Twenties perfectly.

●     Acting: Leonardo DiCaprio's portrayal of Gatsby often received high marks, with some calling it a career-best performance. Others commended the overall cast, including Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan and Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway.

●     Faithfulness to the Source Material: While some liberties were taken, many reviewers appreciated that the film retained the core themes and plot of F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel.

Mixed Reviews:

●     Directorial Style: Luhrmann's signature flamboyant style, with its fast pacing and use of modern music, was a point of contention. Some found it engaging and visually stunning, while others felt it clashed with the story's emotional depth or even overshadowed the characters.

●     Emotional Resonance: Some reviews noted that the film excelled in portraying the superficiality and extravagance of the era but struggled to capture the deeper emotions and complexities of the characters' relationships.

●     Pacing: The film's fast-paced editing and energetic tone were praised by some but criticized by others for feeling rushed and detracting from the story's contemplative nature.

Negative Reviews:

●     Overblown and Exaggerated: Some reviewers found the film's visuals and soundtrack overwhelming, feeling they detracted from the story's core themes and characters.

●     Lack of Emotional Depth: Some felt the film prioritized spectacle over emotional nuance, leaving the characters and their motivations underdeveloped.

●     Inaccuracy to the Novel: While most agreed the film captured the essence of the novel, some criticized specific deviations from the source material.

Overall:

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" is a visually stunning and energetic film that has its share of both praise and criticism. Whether you enjoy it depends on your individual preferences and what you value in a film adaptation.

Additional Resources:

●     Roger Ebert Review: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-great-gatsby-2013

●     IMDb Reviews: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1343092/

●     Not-So-Modern Girl Review: http://thegreatgatsbygta.weebly.com/performance-reviews-history/reviews-of-the-great-gatsby-performances

Based on the summary of the review, what is the MOST common criticism of Baz Luhrmann's directing style for the film?

Too slow and lacking energy.

Too sentimental and melodramatic.

It clashed with the emotional depth of the story

Does not accurately depict the Roaring Twenties.

Too focused on the source material.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The Great Gatsby (2013): A Review Roundup

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" by Baz Luhrmann sparked a variety of reactions, ranging from enthusiastic praise to mixed reviews. Here's a summary of different perspectives:

Positive Reviews:

●     Visuals and Soundtrack: Many reviewers were impressed by the film's aesthetic, praising the lavish sets, costumes, and energetic soundtrack. Some felt it captured the decadence and excitement of the Roaring Twenties perfectly.

●     Acting: Leonardo DiCaprio's portrayal of Gatsby often received high marks, with some calling it a career-best performance. Others commended the overall cast, including Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan and Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway.

●     Faithfulness to the Source Material: While some liberties were taken, many reviewers appreciated that the film retained the core themes and plot of F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel.

Mixed Reviews:

●     Directorial Style: Luhrmann's signature flamboyant style, with its fast pacing and use of modern music, was a point of contention. Some found it engaging and visually stunning, while others felt it clashed with the story's emotional depth or even overshadowed the characters.

●     Emotional Resonance: Some reviews noted that the film excelled in portraying the superficiality and extravagance of the era but struggled to capture the deeper emotions and complexities of the characters' relationships.

●     Pacing: The film's fast-paced editing and energetic tone were praised by some but criticized by others for feeling rushed and detracting from the story's contemplative nature.

Negative Reviews:

●     Overblown and Exaggerated: Some reviewers found the film's visuals and soundtrack overwhelming, feeling they detracted from the story's core themes and characters.

●     Lack of Emotional Depth: Some felt the film prioritized spectacle over emotional nuance, leaving the characters and their motivations underdeveloped.

●     Inaccuracy to the Novel: While most agreed the film captured the essence of the novel, some criticized specific deviations from the source material.

Overall:

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" is a visually stunning and energetic film that has its share of both praise and criticism. Whether you enjoy it depends on your individual preferences and what you value in a film adaptation.

Additional Resources:

●     Roger Ebert Review: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-great-gatsby-2013

●     IMDb Reviews: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1343092/

●     Not-So-Modern Girl Review: http://thegreatgatsbygta.weebly.com/performance-reviews-history/reviews-of-the-great-gatsby-performances

Which aspect of the film received the least criticism according to the summary of reviews?

Acting performance

Faithfulness to the novel

Pacing and editing

Use of modern music

Overall visual aesthetics

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The Great Gatsby (2013): A Review Roundup

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" by Baz Luhrmann sparked a variety of reactions, ranging from enthusiastic praise to mixed reviews. Here's a summary of different perspectives:

Positive Reviews:

●     Visuals and Soundtrack: Many reviewers were impressed by the film's aesthetic, praising the lavish sets, costumes, and energetic soundtrack. Some felt it captured the decadence and excitement of the Roaring Twenties perfectly.

●     Acting: Leonardo DiCaprio's portrayal of Gatsby often received high marks, with some calling it a career-best performance. Others commended the overall cast, including Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan and Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway.

●     Faithfulness to the Source Material: While some liberties were taken, many reviewers appreciated that the film retained the core themes and plot of F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel.

Mixed Reviews:

●     Directorial Style: Luhrmann's signature flamboyant style, with its fast pacing and use of modern music, was a point of contention. Some found it engaging and visually stunning, while others felt it clashed with the story's emotional depth or even overshadowed the characters.

●     Emotional Resonance: Some reviews noted that the film excelled in portraying the superficiality and extravagance of the era but struggled to capture the deeper emotions and complexities of the characters' relationships.

●     Pacing: The film's fast-paced editing and energetic tone were praised by some but criticized by others for feeling rushed and detracting from the story's contemplative nature.

Negative Reviews:

●     Overblown and Exaggerated: Some reviewers found the film's visuals and soundtrack overwhelming, feeling they detracted from the story's core themes and characters.

●     Lack of Emotional Depth: Some felt the film prioritized spectacle over emotional nuance, leaving the characters and their motivations underdeveloped.

●     Inaccuracy to the Novel: While most agreed the film captured the essence of the novel, some criticized specific deviations from the source material.

Overall:

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" is a visually stunning and energetic film that has its share of both praise and criticism. Whether you enjoy it depends on your individual preferences and what you value in a film adaptation.

Additional Resources:

●     Roger Ebert Review: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-great-gatsby-2013

●     IMDb Reviews: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1343092/

●     Not-So-Modern Girl Review: http://thegreatgatsbygta.weebly.com/performance-reviews-history/reviews-of-the-great-gatsby-performances

If you are someone who values emotional nuances and character development in a film, the summary of the review suggests you might:

Like the 2013 adaptation of The Great Gatsby.

Find this film visually stunning but lacking in emotion.

Appreciate the fidelity to the source material.

Enjoy the energetic soundtrack and fast tempo.

Be disappointed with the casting choices.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The Great Gatsby (2013): A Review Roundup

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" by Baz Luhrmann sparked a variety of reactions, ranging from enthusiastic praise to mixed reviews. Here's a summary of different perspectives:

Positive Reviews:

●     Visuals and Soundtrack: Many reviewers were impressed by the film's aesthetic, praising the lavish sets, costumes, and energetic soundtrack. Some felt it captured the decadence and excitement of the Roaring Twenties perfectly.

●     Acting: Leonardo DiCaprio's portrayal of Gatsby often received high marks, with some calling it a career-best performance. Others commended the overall cast, including Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan and Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway.

●     Faithfulness to the Source Material: While some liberties were taken, many reviewers appreciated that the film retained the core themes and plot of F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel.

Mixed Reviews:

●     Directorial Style: Luhrmann's signature flamboyant style, with its fast pacing and use of modern music, was a point of contention. Some found it engaging and visually stunning, while others felt it clashed with the story's emotional depth or even overshadowed the characters.

●     Emotional Resonance: Some reviews noted that the film excelled in portraying the superficiality and extravagance of the era but struggled to capture the deeper emotions and complexities of the characters' relationships.

●     Pacing: The film's fast-paced editing and energetic tone were praised by some but criticized by others for feeling rushed and detracting from the story's contemplative nature.

Negative Reviews:

●     Overblown and Exaggerated: Some reviewers found the film's visuals and soundtrack overwhelming, feeling they detracted from the story's core themes and characters.

●     Lack of Emotional Depth: Some felt the film prioritized spectacle over emotional nuance, leaving the characters and their motivations underdeveloped.

●     Inaccuracy to the Novel: While most agreed the film captured the essence of the novel, some criticized specific deviations from the source material.

Overall:

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" is a visually stunning and energetic film that has its share of both praise and criticism. Whether you enjoy it depends on your individual preferences and what you value in a film adaptation.

Additional Resources:

●     Roger Ebert Review: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-great-gatsby-2013

●     IMDb Reviews: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1343092/

●     Not-So-Modern Girl Review: http://thegreatgatsbygta.weebly.com/performance-reviews-history/reviews-of-the-great-gatsby-performances

Reviews mention 'mixed reviews' for the pacing of the film. This means:

Everyone hates how fast the film is.

Some people like the pacing, while others feel it is rushed.

The pacing is neither fast nor slow.

The review forgot to mention pacing at all.

Pacing is specifically praised for its modern feel.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The Great Gatsby (2013): A Review Roundup

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" by Baz Luhrmann sparked a variety of reactions, ranging from enthusiastic praise to mixed reviews. Here's a summary of different perspectives:

Positive Reviews:

●     Visuals and Soundtrack: Many reviewers were impressed by the film's aesthetic, praising the lavish sets, costumes, and energetic soundtrack. Some felt it captured the decadence and excitement of the Roaring Twenties perfectly.

●     Acting: Leonardo DiCaprio's portrayal of Gatsby often received high marks, with some calling it a career-best performance. Others commended the overall cast, including Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan and Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway.

●     Faithfulness to the Source Material: While some liberties were taken, many reviewers appreciated that the film retained the core themes and plot of F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel.

Mixed Reviews:

●     Directorial Style: Luhrmann's signature flamboyant style, with its fast pacing and use of modern music, was a point of contention. Some found it engaging and visually stunning, while others felt it clashed with the story's emotional depth or even overshadowed the characters.

●     Emotional Resonance: Some reviews noted that the film excelled in portraying the superficiality and extravagance of the era but struggled to capture the deeper emotions and complexities of the characters' relationships.

●     Pacing: The film's fast-paced editing and energetic tone were praised by some but criticized by others for feeling rushed and detracting from the story's contemplative nature.

Negative Reviews:

●     Overblown and Exaggerated: Some reviewers found the film's visuals and soundtrack overwhelming, feeling they detracted from the story's core themes and characters.

●     Lack of Emotional Depth: Some felt the film prioritized spectacle over emotional nuance, leaving the characters and their motivations underdeveloped.

●     Inaccuracy to the Novel: While most agreed the film captured the essence of the novel, some criticized specific deviations from the source material.

Overall:

The 2013 adaptation of "The Great Gatsby" is a visually stunning and energetic film that has its share of both praise and criticism. Whether you enjoy it depends on your individual preferences and what you value in a film adaptation.

Additional Resources:

●     Roger Ebert Review: https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-great-gatsby-2013

●     IMDb Reviews: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1343092/

●     Not-So-Modern Girl Review: http://thegreatgatsbygta.weebly.com/performance-reviews-history/reviews-of-the-great-gatsby-performances

What is the main point of the review summary?

Praising the 2013 adaptation of The Great Gatsby as a masterpiece.

Warning viewers that the film is visually confusing and perplexing.

Highlighting various perspectives and criticisms surrounding the film.

Comparing the film to other adaptations of the novel.

Recommending additional sources to learn more about the film.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Setting: A group of friends are having coffee at a local cafe.

Characters:

●     Sarah: A passionate environmental activist.

●     David: A concerned citizen, but not deeply informed about climate change.

●     Emma: A skeptical individual who questions the severity of climate change.

●     Michael: A scientist specializing in climate research.

Discussion:

Sarah: I'm really worried about the recent heat waves and wildfires. It's clear that climate change is accelerating, and the dangers are becoming more evident every day.

David: I agree, Sarah. These extreme weather events are scary. I'm starting to see the impact on my own community, with droughts and floods becoming more frequent.

Emma: I understand your concern, but I'm not convinced it's all due to human activity. There have always been natural variations in climate throughout history.

Michael: That's true, Emma, there are natural cycles. However, the scientific evidence overwhelmingly points to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions as the primary driver of the current rapid warming trend. The data is clear: global temperatures are rising at an unprecedented rate, and this is causing significant changes in our planet's climate.

David: What are the biggest dangers we face with climate change, Michael?

Michael: There are many, but some of the most concerning include rising sea levels, which threaten coastal communities, and more extreme weather events like heat waves, droughts, floods, and storms. These can displace people, damage infrastructure, and disrupt food production. Additionally, warming oceans and changing weather patterns can harm ecosystems and biodiversity.

Sarah: And it's not just about the environment, it's also about social justice. Climate change will disproportionately impact vulnerable communities, both within and across countries. We need to act now to mitigate the damage and ensure a just transition to a sustainable future.

Emma: I hear you, but I'm worried about the economic costs of taking drastic action. What about the impact on jobs and industries?

Michael: It's true that there will be economic challenges, but there are also significant opportunities in the transition to a green economy. Investing in renewable energy, sustainable infrastructure, and green technologies can create new jobs and boost economic growth.

David: I think it's important to find solutions that work for everyone. We need to invest in green technologies and adapt to the changes we can't avoid, while also ensuring a just transition for workers and communities impacted by the shift.

Sarah: Absolutely! And individual action matters too. We can all make choices that reduce our carbon footprint and support sustainable practices. It's about working together, at all levels, to address this global challenge.

Emma: This conversation has been enlightening. I still have some questions, but I'm starting to understand the urgency of the issue. What resources can I use to learn more?

Michael: There are many great resources available, including websites of reputable scientific organizations, documentaries, and even citizen science projects. We can all learn more and get involved in finding solutions.

.Based on the conversation, who is the MOST concerned about the direct dangers of climate change?

Sarah

David

Emma

Michael

They are all equally concerned.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Setting: A group of friends are having coffee at a local cafe.

Characters:

●     Sarah: A passionate environmental activist.

●     David: A concerned citizen, but not deeply informed about climate change.

●     Emma: A skeptical individual who questions the severity of climate change.

●     Michael: A scientist specializing in climate research.

Discussion:

Sarah: I'm really worried about the recent heat waves and wildfires. It's clear that climate change is accelerating, and the dangers are becoming more evident every day.

David: I agree, Sarah. These extreme weather events are scary. I'm starting to see the impact on my own community, with droughts and floods becoming more frequent.

Emma: I understand your concern, but I'm not convinced it's all due to human activity. There have always been natural variations in climate throughout history.

Michael: That's true, Emma, there are natural cycles. However, the scientific evidence overwhelmingly points to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions as the primary driver of the current rapid warming trend. The data is clear: global temperatures are rising at an unprecedented rate, and this is causing significant changes in our planet's climate.

David: What are the biggest dangers we face with climate change, Michael?

Michael: There are many, but some of the most concerning include rising sea levels, which threaten coastal communities, and more extreme weather events like heat waves, droughts, floods, and storms. These can displace people, damage infrastructure, and disrupt food production. Additionally, warming oceans and changing weather patterns can harm ecosystems and biodiversity.

Sarah: And it's not just about the environment, it's also about social justice. Climate change will disproportionately impact vulnerable communities, both within and across countries. We need to act now to mitigate the damage and ensure a just transition to a sustainable future.

Emma: I hear you, but I'm worried about the economic costs of taking drastic action. What about the impact on jobs and industries?

Michael: It's true that there will be economic challenges, but there are also significant opportunities in the transition to a green economy. Investing in renewable energy, sustainable infrastructure, and green technologies can create new jobs and boost economic growth.

David: I think it's important to find solutions that work for everyone. We need to invest in green technologies and adapt to the changes we can't avoid, while also ensuring a just transition for workers and communities impacted by the shift.

Sarah: Absolutely! And individual action matters too. We can all make choices that reduce our carbon footprint and support sustainable practices. It's about working together, at all levels, to address this global challenge.

Emma: This conversation has been enlightening. I still have some questions, but I'm starting to understand the urgency of the issue. What resources can I use to learn more?

Michael: There are many great resources available, including websites of reputable scientific organizations, documentaries, and even citizen science projects. We can all learn more and get involved in finding solutions.

What is the MAIN POINT that Michael uses to argue that climate change is primarily caused by humans?

He mentions recent extreme weather events.

He emphasizes the implications of social justice.

He highlights the economic opportunities from green solutions.

He cites scientific evidence and data about rising temperatures.

He calls for individual action and responsibility.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?