MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

Quiz
•
English
•
University
•
Hard
JH Chan
Used 1+ times
FREE Resource
8 questions
Show all answers
1.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
Idea units
(1) ______________ (In...) test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
2.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret (2) ______________ less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
3.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units (3) _____ _________ (be) either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
4.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) (4)_________ 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
5.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any (5)______ ____ ___________ with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
6.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units (6) _____ ________ the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
7.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 (7) _______ samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.
8.
FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment (8) ______their essential and secondary idea units _______ (identify).
Similar Resources on Wayground
10 questions
Navigating Ordered Pairs: Fun Word Problems for 5th Grade

Quiz
•
5th Grade - University
10 questions
Main Idea and Implied Main Idea

Quiz
•
University
10 questions
Calculating and Interpreting Slope in Real Life

Quiz
•
8th Grade - University
10 questions
Calculating and Interpreting Slope from Graphs

Quiz
•
8th Grade - University
10 questions
Real-World Average Rates of Change: Problem Solving

Quiz
•
9th Grade - University
10 questions
Exploring Exponential Growth: Graphing and Growth Factors

Quiz
•
8th Grade - University
10 questions
Meeting

Quiz
•
University
10 questions
Topic and Controlling Idea

Quiz
•
University
Popular Resources on Wayground
10 questions
Video Games

Quiz
•
6th - 12th Grade
10 questions
Lab Safety Procedures and Guidelines

Interactive video
•
6th - 10th Grade
25 questions
Multiplication Facts

Quiz
•
5th Grade
10 questions
UPDATED FOREST Kindness 9-22

Lesson
•
9th - 12th Grade
22 questions
Adding Integers

Quiz
•
6th Grade
15 questions
Subtracting Integers

Quiz
•
7th Grade
20 questions
US Constitution Quiz

Quiz
•
11th Grade
10 questions
Exploring Digital Citizenship Essentials

Interactive video
•
6th - 10th Grade