MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

University

8 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

NF Pre-Test_Understanding Main Idea

NF Pre-Test_Understanding Main Idea

University

10 Qs

Testing

Testing

University

9 Qs

Embedded questions

Embedded questions

University

10 Qs

OUTLINING

OUTLINING

10th Grade - University

10 Qs

Coordinate Challenges: Word Problems & Graphing Lines

Coordinate Challenges: Word Problems & Graphing Lines

6th Grade - University

10 Qs

Exploring Common Differences and Ratios in Real Life

Exploring Common Differences and Ratios in Real Life

8th Grade - University

10 Qs

Writing a Paragraph

Writing a Paragraph

University

7 Qs

Coordinate Geometry: Area & Perimeter Challenges for 6th Grade

Coordinate Geometry: Area & Perimeter Challenges for 6th Grade

6th Grade - University

10 Qs

MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

MCCP Lesson 5 Working memory article - Idea units

Assessment

Quiz

English

University

Hard

Created by

JH Chan

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

8 questions

Show all answers

1.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Idea units

(1) ______________ (In...) test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

2.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units

In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret (2) ______________ less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

3.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units (3) _____ _________ (be) either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

4.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) (4)_________ 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

5.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any (5)______ ____ ___________ with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

6.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units (6) _____ ________ the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

7.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 (7) _______ samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment with their essential and secondary idea units identified.

8.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Idea units
In an effort to test the hypothesis that interpreters with more expertise are better at selecting the more important information to interpret than less expert individuals, each critical sentence was further divided into idea units, ranging in number from two to ten units per sentence. Two native speakers of English rated the importance of each idea unit and categorized the idea units as being either essential or secondary to the meaning of the critical sentence. The inter-rater reliability (Kappa) was 0.75. After discussing any discrepancy in judgment with the raters, the first author acted as the third and final judge on the importance of the idea units on which the two raters disagreed. The numbers of essential idea units were 34, 30 and 30 for each of the three texts respectively, and those of secondary idea units were 34, 34 and 30. Table 2 lists samples of critical sentences from each of the three texts used in the experiment (8) ______their essential and secondary idea units _______ (identify).