
Critiques of the Cosmological Argument
Authored by Linda Gray
Religious Studies
12th Grade
Used 3+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
5 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
What is the cosmological argument?
The cosmological argument posits that the existence of the universe necessitates a first cause, typically attributed to God.
The cosmological argument argues that the universe is a result of random chance without any cause.
The cosmological argument claims that the universe is a simulation created by advanced beings.
The cosmological argument states that the universe is eternal and has no beginning.
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
What is Hume's perspective on the necessity of a first cause in the context of the cosmological argument?
Hume asserts that a first cause is essential for understanding existence.
According to Hume, the concept of a first cause is not logically necessary.
Hume agrees with the cosmological argument's assertion of a first cause.
Hume believes that the idea of causation does not require a first cause, as it is derived from human experience.
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
What is Kant's critique regarding existence as a predicate?
Kant's critique is that existence is not a predicate.
Kant states that existence is a fundamental quality of being.
Kant believes existence enhances the properties of an object.
Kant argues that existence is a necessary predicate.
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
In what way does Hume argue against the necessity of a first cause?
Hume believes the universe was created by a divine being.
Hume argues that the universe may be eternal and does not require a first cause.
Hume claims that everything must have a first cause.
Hume argues that the universe is a result of random chance.
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
How do Hume and Kant's views differ on the nature of reality and existence?
Kant argues that all knowledge is derived solely from innate ideas, dismissing experience.
Hume focuses on empirical experience and skepticism, while Kant distinguishes between phenomena and noumena, asserting that there is an unknowable reality beyond our perceptions.
Hume and Kant both agree that reality is entirely subjective and varies from person to person.
Hume believes in a fixed reality that can be fully understood through reason.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?