Arrest, Search & Seizure Review

Arrest, Search & Seizure Review

13 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Hatchet by Gary Paulsen 3/4 Review

Hatchet by Gary Paulsen 3/4 Review

5th Grade

14 Qs

vfx15 Anatomía Dixestivo

vfx15 Anatomía Dixestivo

Professional Development

10 Qs

Úvod do programování

Úvod do programování

KG - University

14 Qs

Copie de Circuits électriques 9 réac, puiss réact, déphasage, scope

Copie de Circuits électriques 9 réac, puiss réact, déphasage, scope

KG - University

10 Qs

Introduction to linguistics: the quiz

Introduction to linguistics: the quiz

KG - University

13 Qs

 End of Unit 1 Assessment

End of Unit 1 Assessment

KG - University

15 Qs

PENILAIAN HARIAN MATEMATIKA BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG

PENILAIAN HARIAN MATEMATIKA BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG

KG - University

10 Qs

Arrest, Search & Seizure Review

Arrest, Search & Seizure Review

Assessment

Quiz

others

Medium

Used 4+ times

FREE Resource

13 questions

Show all answers

1.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

2 mins • Ungraded

In your own words explain what Beyond a reasonable doubt is.

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which court case is the Stop & Frisk Doctrine?
Terry v Ohio
Carroll v US
Tennessee v Garner
Miranda v Arizona
Escobedo v Illinois

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which court case is Fruit from the Poisonous Tree?
Wong Sun v United States
Terry v Ohio
Carroll v US
Tennessee v Garner
Miranda v Arizona

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which court case is a search warrant is required to search the contents of a cell phone?
Riley v California
Terry v Ohio
Carroll v US
Tennessee v Garner
Miranda v Arizona

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which court case is a vehicle can be searched solely on probable cause and not a search warrant?
Carroll v US
Terry v Ohio
Tennessee v Garner
Miranda v Arizona
Escobedo v Illinois

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which court case is the Wingspan Rule?
Chimel v California
Terry v Ohio
Carroll v US
Tennessee v Garner
Miranda v Arizona

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 4 pts

Which court case is an officer cannot shoot someone in the back unless they are an immediate threat to another?
Tennessee v Garner
Terry v Ohio
Carroll v US
Miranda v Arizona
Escobedo v Illinois

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?