4B plastic ban (2)

According to the passage, what was the main argument made by plastic bag manufacturers when the Mandatory Producer Responsibility Scheme was first introduced in Hong Kong in 2009?

• The scheme was ineffective and pointless, as non-woven bags would lead to an overall increase in plastic materials used.

• The scheme would cause major disruptions for their businesses.

• The scheme did not go far enough in banning all types of plastic bags.

• The scheme was an unnecessary burden that would hurt the economy.

The passage states that for a non-woven bag to be as "environmentally friendly" as a plastic bag, it must be reused at least how many times? (write in number )

What happened to the use of plastic bags and non-woven bags in Hong Kong after the Mandatory Producer Responsibility Scheme was first implemented in 2009?

• Plastic bag usage declined significantly, while non-woven bag usage did not change much.

• Both plastic bag and non-woven bag usage declined significantly.

• Plastic bag usage declined significantly, but non-woven bag usage surged dramatically.

• Neither plastic bag nor non-woven bag usage changed much.

Which of the following steps did the Environmental Protection Department take to promote the Mandatory Producer Responsibility Scheme in Hong Kong?

• They held district briefings in civic centers and community halls.

• They paid educational visits to retailers and wet markets.

• They ran extensive advertising campaigns on buses, TV, and radio.

• All of the options.

What was a major issue identified with the Mandatory Producer Responsibility Scheme in Hong Kong?
Consumers received _________ plastic bags due to the loopholes in the scheme.