
Understanding Ontological Arguments
Authored by James Melligan
Philosophy
8th Grade
Used 1+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
10 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Hey Tabby, Mattie, and Mary! Ready for a brain teaser? What type of reasoning do ontological arguments famously use?
a priori
a posteriori
empirical
inductive
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Pop quiz time! Imo, Tabby, and Mattie are discussing in a philosophy seminar. They explore a classic question: According to Anselm, why must God exist?
It is greater to exist in reality than only in the mind
Existence is a perfection
God is a supremely perfect being
God can be conceived as non-existent
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Imo, Mattie, and Clemmie are discussing in their philosophy class. They're examining Descartes' ontological argument. What conclusion do they reach?
God exists because He is the greatest conceivable being
God exists because He is necessary
God exists because we can imagine Him
God exists because existence is a perfection
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Hey Tabby, Imo, and Clemmie! Dive into this brain teaser: What is the main critique by Gaunilo regarding Anselm's argument?
God's existence is not necessary
Existence is not a predicate
God's concept is self-contradictory
Anything can be defined into existence
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
During a lively debate in philosophy class, Clemmie raises a question about Hume's critique. She asks, 'What does Hume argue about the ontological argument?'
'God does not exist' can be coherently conceived
God's existence is necessary
'God does not exist' is a contradiction
Existence adds to the concept of a being
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Hey there, philosophy buffs! Imo, Clemmie, and Mattie are debating a classic topic. They're puzzled about Kant's critique of the ontological argument. Can you help them figure out why Kant thought this argument doesn't hold up?
Existence is not a predicate
Existence is a perfection
God's existence is self-contradictory
God's existence is analytically true
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Hey there, Tabby and Mattie! Let's dive into a deep philosophical question. What is the basis of Malcolm's ontological argument?
God's existence is contingent
God's existence is either necessary or impossible
God's existence is self-evident
God's existence is a perfection
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?