
Toulmin Argumentative Method Quiz
Authored by Rayan Alaoui
English
12th Grade
Used 1+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
9 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What are the three fundamental parts of a Toulmin argument?
Qualifier, Rebuttal, Claim
Claim, Grounds, Warrant, Backing
Qualifier, Rebuttal, Backing, Grounds
Claim, Grounds, Warrant
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What is the purpose of the qualifier in a Toulmin argument?
To provide additional support for the warrant
To build credibility
To acknowledge another valid view of the situation
To show that a claim may not be true in all circumstances
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which component of a Toulmin argument is the assertion that authors would like to prove to their audience?
Warrant
Grounds
Qualifier
Claim
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What is the role of the backing in a Toulmin argument?
To provide additional support for the warrant
To acknowledge another valid view of the situation
To show that a claim may not be true in all circumstances
To build credibility
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which part of a Toulmin argument is the assumption that links the grounds to the claim?
Backing
Warrant
Rebuttal
Qualifier
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What is the purpose of the rebuttal in a Toulmin argument?
To show that a claim may not be true in all circumstances
To build credibility
To provide additional support for the warrant
To acknowledge another valid view of the situation
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What is the sentence pattern recommended for writing a good argument sentence in Toulmin method?
Because of this supporting point (reasoning plus evidence), my fittingly qualified claim makes sense, especially when you consider this warrant (principle), which is backed by this evidence; while a particular objection might be made, additional reasoning rebuts it.
Because of this supporting point (reasoning plus evidence), my fittingly qualified claim makes sense, especially when you consider this warrant (principle), which is backed by this evidence; while a particular objection might be made, additional reasoning supports it.
Because of this supporting point (reasoning plus evidence), my fittingly qualified claim makes sense, especially when you consider this warrant (principle), which is backed by this evidence; while a particular objection might be made, additional reasoning ignores it.
Because of this supporting point (reasoning plus evidence), my fittingly qualified claim makes sense, especially when you consider this warrant (principle), which is backed by this evidence; while a particular objection might be made, additional reasoning accepts it.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?