1. What is this whole story mostly about?

• A. Going directly from observation to conclusion is called non-scientific

  thinking.

• B. The scientific method is a way of thinking that helps you to avoid drawing

  incorrect conclusions.

• C. Non-scientific thinking happens all the time.

Tags

CCSS.RI.6.2

CCSS.RI.7.2

CCSS.RI.8.2

CCSS.RL.7.2

CCSS.RL.8.2

2. Which of these is a small piece of information from the story that makes the

story more interesting?

• A. People in ancient times believed that the sun travels around the earth.

• B. People in ancient times knew that the earth was round.

• C. People in ancient times didn’t try to explain the world around them.

Tags

CCSS.RI.2.1

CCSS.RI.3.1

CCSS.RL.1.1

CCSS.RL.2.1

CCSS.RL.3.1

3. Which of these is a small piece of information from the story that makes the

story more interesting?

• A. In the example, observation proved that eating a candy bar made a sick

  stomach feel better.

• B. In the example, there could be several reasons your sick stomach felt

  better after you ate a candy bar.

• C. In the example, there is only one explanation for why a sick stomach

  would feel better after you ate a candy bar.

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.2

CCSS.RL.6.2

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.7.2

CCSS.RL.8.1

4. Which of these is a small piece of information from the story that makes the

story more interesting?

• A. In the example, you could test your hypothesis by not eating a candy bar

  the next time you have a sick stomach.

• B. In the example, you could test your hypothesis by eating a different kind of

  candy bar the next time you have a sick stomach.

• C. In the example, you could test your hypothesis by eating a candy bar the

  next time you have a sick stomach.

Tags

CCSS.RI.2.1

CCSS.RI.3.1

CCSS.RL.1.1

CCSS.RL.2.1

CCSS.RL.3.1

5. What is another small piece of information from the story that makes the

story more interesting?

Tags

CCSS.RI.6.2

CCSS.RI.7.2

CCSS.RL.6.1

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.7.2