Property Midterm MC

Property Midterm MC

Professional Development

20 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

E5CTO - Unit 5 - It all depends...

E5CTO - Unit 5 - It all depends...

Professional Development

15 Qs

CSC Reviewer 102

CSC Reviewer 102

Professional Development

20 Qs

CCA Quiz

CCA Quiz

Professional Development

15 Qs

Property

Property

Professional Development

22 Qs

Rights, Interests, Estates, Ownership Pt1

Rights, Interests, Estates, Ownership Pt1

Professional Development

25 Qs

#PuksainAngMgaKorap Part 1 Recap

#PuksainAngMgaKorap Part 1 Recap

Professional Development

15 Qs

Property Estates and Ownership

Property Estates and Ownership

Professional Development

16 Qs

PI Legal Assistant quizz

PI Legal Assistant quizz

Professional Development

20 Qs

Property Midterm MC

Property Midterm MC

Assessment

Quiz

Other

Professional Development

Easy

Created by

Nicholas Ramos

Used 5+ times

FREE Resource

20 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In a deed, Oscar conveys Blackacre “to Anne if the land is used for residential purposes

only.” What interests are created?

A. Anne has a fee simple on condition subsequent, and Oscar has a right of entry.

B. Anne has a fee simple determinable, and Oscar has a possibility of reverter.

C. Anne has a contingent remainder, and Oscar has an alternative contingent

remainder.

D. Anne has a fee simple subject to executory limitation, and Oscar has an executory

interest.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Omar conveys Whiteacre “to Avery for life, then to Avery’s children”. Is the interest in

Avery’s children valid under the traditional Rule Against Perpetuities?

A. Yes, because Avery is the validating life.

B. Yes, because Avery’s children are their own validating lives.

C. Yes, because Omar is the validating life.

D. No, because there is no validating life.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In a will, Orlando conveys Greenacre “to Abel for life, then to such of Abel’s

grandchildren then living.” Is the interest of the grandchildren valid under the

traditional Rule Against Perpetuities?

A. Yes, because Abel is the validating life.

B. Yes, because the grandchildren are their own validating lives.

C. Yes, because Abel’s children are the validating lives.

D. No, because there is no validating life.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following has NOT been proposed (in materials we have studied) for

reforming the traditional Rule Against Perpetuities?

A. Waiting to see if an estate will vest remotely rather than considering hypothetical

scenarios that might cause such remote vesting.

B. Fixing a specific number of years beyond which interests must vest to be valid.

C. Declaring that people of particular ages are not capable of having more children as a

matter of law.

D. Extending the doctrine of the Rule Against Perpetuities to cover future interests

retained by the transferor.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

5. Which of the following is the most widely embraced economic rationale for trademark

law?

A. It gives firms an incentive to invest in the quality of their products.

B. It provides an incentive for creators of artistic works that are expensive to create

and cheap to copy.

C. It provides monopoly conditions for the merchant given the trademark, which

facilitates pricing in accordance with costs.

D. Unlike the prior common law of unfair competition, trademark law does not allow

recovery based on the defendant’s profits.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

6. Which of the following would be a reason to protect a property entitlement with a

liability rule rather than a property rule?

A. The difficulty of proving damages with reasonable certainty.

B. The presence of monopoly holdout problems.

C. The greater respect paid by liability rules to idiosyncratic or subjective value.

D. The need to promote Kaldor-Hicks rather than Pareto efficiency.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

7. Believing that he was dying, Desperate said to his son Worthless “My car is yours.”

Later, Desperate recovered from his illness, and refused to let Worthless have the car.

Worthless sues Desperate. Which of the following would be the WEAKEST defense for

Desperate?

A. Promises to give a gift are unenforceable without consideration.

B. Gifts are not valid without delivery.

C. Gifts depend on manifested rather than subjective intention.

D. Gifts causa mortis are not valid if the dying person recovers.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?