Cases

Cases

University

44 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

đề 7 chính trị

đề 7 chính trị

University

43 Qs

giai phẫu về hệ tiêu hóa 1

giai phẫu về hệ tiêu hóa 1

University

44 Qs

Алгоритм 40

Алгоритм 40

University

40 Qs

Kiểm tra kiến thức sinh học

Kiểm tra kiến thức sinh học

University

40 Qs

Oxidacion de acidos grasos y cetogenesis

Oxidacion de acidos grasos y cetogenesis

University

42 Qs

chug2

chug2

University

48 Qs

тарих 180-220

тарих 180-220

University

40 Qs

Simulasi Combat compotition part 2

Simulasi Combat compotition part 2

12th Grade - University

41 Qs

Cases

Cases

Assessment

Quiz

Others

University

Medium

Created by

Ameera Layla

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

44 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Chapter 6: incorporation of compan - Availability of name

Solomon v A Solomon Co. & Ltd (1897)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor) [2014]

Chitty J in Levy v Abercorns 7 Slab Co.

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

S.27(5)

Ammonia Soda Co Ltd v Chamberlain

Re Spanish Prospecting Co (1911)

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor)

Totex - Adon Pty Ltd v Marco

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Availability of name

Re Benjamin Cope and Sons Ltd

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor) [2014]

Evans v Rival Granite Quarries Ltd [1910]

Pender v Lushington [1877]

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Incorporation of company - Availabillity of name

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Anor) [2014]

North-West Transportation Co.Ltd v Beatty [1887]

Re Kong Thai Swamills Sdn Bhd

Industrial Equity Ltd v Blackburn

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Court held that the word 'Angkasa was not descriptive of any business and as such no one ought to monopoly over the usage of particular word as a trade name.

Angkasa Jurutera Perunding Sdn Bhd v Pendaftar Syarikat (Ketua Pengarah Eksekutif Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia & Ors)

Barron v Parter (1914)

Boardman v Phipps [1967]

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver

6.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

S.20 Power of body corporate

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

Foss v Harbottle [1843]

Macaura v Nothern Assurance Co Ltd

Re Noel Tedman Holding Pty Ltd [1967]

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

S.21 (1) (a) To sue and be sued

Re Noel Tedman Holdings Pty Ltd

Lee v Lee's Air Farming [1961]

Macaura v Nothern Assurance Co. Ltd

Foss v Harbottle [1843]

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?