Topic 9: Frustration

Topic 9: Frustration

University

10 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

165 Session 10 - content

165 Session 10 - content

University

8 Qs

FNAF: Security Breach

FNAF: Security Breach

4th Grade - University

11 Qs

Business Law

Business Law

University

15 Qs

Contract- Consideration

Contract- Consideration

University

13 Qs

BL CHAP 18

BL CHAP 18

University

10 Qs

Law of Contract

Law of Contract

University

10 Qs

LGST101 Business Law - Week 7 Discharge

LGST101 Business Law - Week 7 Discharge

University

10 Qs

Five Nights At Freddy's

Five Nights At Freddy's

5th Grade - University

13 Qs

Topic 9: Frustration

Topic 9: Frustration

Assessment

Quiz

Other

University

Medium

Created by

MOHAMMED ELSHOBAKE

Used 3+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

A contract may be discharged by

Frustration

Performance

Breach

All answers are correct

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

The courts in Malaysia have recognised that under S.57(2) a contract can be frustrated and discharged with breach or default of either parties.

True

False

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

 If the act becomes difficult to perform

The contract is frustrated

The contract is not frustrated

There is breach of contract

All answers are wrong

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

Choose the correct statement

The frustrating event should take place after the parties made the contract

It is necessary that the frustrating event is unforeseen by the parties

It does not matter whether the frustrating event happened after or before formation of the contract

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

Choose the correct statement

A frustrating event must take place with fault of party seeking to rely on it

No frustration where promisor had prior knowledge of impossibility of a contract

There is frustration when promisor had prior knowledge of impossibility of a contract

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

The legal effect of self-induced frustration:

It discharges a party from his contractual obligations.

The promisor will be liable for breach of contract

It does not discharge a party from his contractual obligations.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

Gopal Sri Ram JCA held that there are three elements woven into the fabric of the doctrine of frustration in the following case:

Affin Bank Bhd v Dinesh Kanavaji a/l Kanawagi [2022]

Chan Buck Kia v Naga Shipping & Trading Co Ltd [1963]

Guan Aik Moh (KL) Sdn Bhd v Selangor Properties Ltd [2007]

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?