Search Header Logo

Final Exam (Intro)

Authored by Matthew Taylor

Philosophy

University

Used 5+ times

Final Exam (Intro)
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

9 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary question about personal identity?

what is it about persons that makes it true that they are the same person over time?

what are the conditions for being a person?

What are the most important aspects of a person's self-concept?

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What kind of identity is the primary concern of philosophers?

Qualitative Identity

Numerical Identity

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the general story of the Perry dialogue?

Sam and Dave try to convince Gretchen that she will survive her bodily death.

Gretchen is convinced of the psychological continuity view of personal identity

Sam and Dave are unsure whether Gretchen is the same person they saw before her accident.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Gretchen is primarily concerned with the question of whether surviving bodily death is _______

conceivable

consistent with physical laws

necessary

5.

MULTIPLE SELECT QUESTION

45 sec • 1 pt

Nozick's entitlement theory includes two principles of justice. Which of the following are these principles?

Principle of Justice in Liberty

Principle of Justice in Transfer

Principle of Justice in Acquisition

Principle of Justice in Equality

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to Nozick, the following would be a patterned principle: "Every person who was born in 1970 should be given 100 dollars."

True

False

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

A compatibilist might object to Chisholm's view by arguing that a person can act freely even if they only had one action open to them. Perhaps they are so morally good that they could not have avoided doing good for others. Many of us would not think that they are not less free just because they are such good people. Chisholm's response is that:

Our intuitions would change if we think about someone so bad they cannot avoid harming others.

If they are free, they must have had freedom in becoming the kind of person who cannot avoid doing good for others.

It is too much up to luck if a morally good person acts well.

None of the above

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?