Landmark Supreme Court cases

Marburg v Madison

• I increase federal control over economic growth

• Gave the court the ability to strike down laws on the ground that they are unconstitutional (judicial review)

• Ruled that federal powers have supremacy over state laws

• Person of African descent cannot be be determined a citizen under the US Constitution.

McCulloch v Maryland

• I increase federal control over economic growth

• Gave the court the ability to strike down laws on the ground that they are unconstitutional (judicial review)

• Ruled that federal powers have supremacy over state laws

• Person of African descent cannot be be determined a citizen under the US Constitution.

Gibbons v Ogden

• I increase federal control over economic growth

• Gave the court the ability to strike down laws on the ground that they are unconstitutional (judicial review)

• Ruled that federal powers have supremacy over state laws

• Person of African descent cannot be be determined a citizen under the US Constitution.

Dred Scott versus Stanford

• I increase federal control over economic growth

• Gave the court the ability to strike down laws on the ground that they are unconstitutional (judicial review)

• Ruled that federal powers have supremacy over state laws

• Person of African descent cannot be be determined a citizen under the US Constitution.

Brown V board of education, Topeka

• Establish the equal protection clause

• Stated, married couples have certain privacy rights that legislators may not violate

• States are required to provide legal counsel two (poor) defendants, charged with a felony

• those accused are required to be read their rights.

Gideon v wainwright

• Establish the equal protection clause

• Stated, married couples have certain privacy rights that legislators may not violate

• States are required to provide legal counsel two (poor) defendants, charged with a felony

• those accused are required to be read their rights.

Miranda v Arizona

• Establish the equal protection clause

• Stated, married couples have certain privacy rights that legislators may not violate

• States are required to provide legal counsel two (poor) defendants, charged with a felony

• those accused are required to be read their rights.

Griswold v Connecticut

• Establish the equal protection clause

• Stated, married couples have certain privacy rights that legislators may not violate

• States are required to provide legal counsel two (poor) defendants, charged with a felony

• those accused are required to be read their rights.