Lecture 1

Lecture 1

University

7 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

CTRW: Begging the Question

CTRW: Begging the Question

University

4 Qs

Modern Philosophy

Modern Philosophy

6th Grade - University

12 Qs

Identify Premise and Conclusion Indicators

Identify Premise and Conclusion Indicators

11th Grade - University

12 Qs

Logic exercises

Logic exercises

University

10 Qs

PHIL 109 2/4/25

PHIL 109 2/4/25

University

4 Qs

Arguments for God’s Existence

Arguments for God’s Existence

University

12 Qs

Ph-2/2: Do Now

Ph-2/2: Do Now

University

12 Qs

Logic

Logic

University

10 Qs

Lecture 1

Lecture 1

Assessment

Quiz

Philosophy

University

Hard

Created by

Ly Le

FREE Resource

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

If something is gold, then it is metallic

Being gold is necessary and sufficient for being metallic

Being gold is necessary but not sufficient for being metallic

Being gold is sufficient but not necessary for being metallic

Being gold is neither necessary nor sufficient for being metallic.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Consider the following argument:

1. Anna scored 90 percent in the physics exam

2. Astrid scored 50 percent in the physics exam.

3. Hence, Anna is better at mathematics than Astrid

What kind of argument is this?

Inductive argument

Adbuctive argument

Truth-preserving argument

None of the above

Answer explanation

Anna’s being better at maths is a good explanation of the test scores. So theargument is abductive. But it’s possible for these test scores to occur, even if Anna isnot better at mathematics. (Maybe Anna was distracted.) So the conclusion of theargument could be false, even if the premises are true. So the argument isn’tdeductive.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Consider the following argument.

1. Anna scored 90 percent in the physics exam.

2. Anyone who scores above 80 percent in the physics exam is smart.

3. Hence, Anna is smart.

What kind of argument is this?

Inductive argument

Adbuctive argument

Truth-preserving argument

None of the above

Answer explanation

It’s impossible for the premises to be true, and the conclusion to be false. (Andthis is true for any argument of this form.) So the argument is truth-preserving.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Consider the following argument.

1. 90 percent of physicists like mathematics.

2. Anna is a physicist

3 Hence, Anna likes mathematics.

What kind of argument is this?

An inductive argument

An adbuctive argument

A truth-preserving argument

None of the above

Answer explanation

Plausible explanation based on statistics

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Consider the following argument.

1. If it rains, then he will get wet.

2. He didn’t get wet.

3. Hence, it didn’t rain.

What kind of argument is this?

Modus Ponens

Modus Tollens

Affirming the Consequent

None of the above

6.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What is the missing premise or premises in the following enthymeme?

1. All Mexicans speak Spanish

2. Hence, all Mexicans know what “tortuga” means.

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

All people who speak Spanish know what “tortuga” means.

7.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What is the missing premise or premises in the following enthymeme?

1. Rob lied to Ravi

2. Hence Rob is not a good friend to Ravi.

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Answer explanation

Good friends do not lie to each other.