ITCLR

A woman shoots her husband. Then she holds him underwater for over 5 minutes. Finally, she hangs him. But 5 minutes later they both go out together and enjoy a wonderful dinner together. How can this be?

How do you make the number 7 even without addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division?

Describe Contract Law in one/two words

Where an agreement is made in a social or domestic context what is the general rule relating to intention to create legal relations?

• The courts presume the parties intended to create legal relations.

• Social or domestic agreements are never legal binding because the parties cannot create

  legal relations.

• All social or domestic agreements are legally binding.

• The courts presume the parties did not intend to create legal relations.

Business agreements sometimes use ‘honour clauses’. What does an honour clause mean in an agreement?

• It is a clause covering business ethics.

• The clause means that the agreement is not legally enforceable.

• The clause means that the agreement is enforceable in the courts.

• The directors of a company are personally liable for the agreement.

In which type of agreement is the intention to create legal relations presumed to exist?

• Agreements between friends or family.

• Commercial or business agreements.

• All written agreements.

• The intention to create legal relations is never presumed in an agreement.

What is the decision of the courts in the case of Balfour v Balfour?

• There was an intention to create legal relations.

• There was no intention to create legal relations.

• There was no consideration to enforce the contract.

• There was proof of consideration to enforce the contract.

There is an intention to create legal relations in?

• I promise my wife dinner in exchange of her taking care of the children.

• I promise my friend a lift to town in exchange of him washing my car.

• I promise my college students lessons in contract in exchange of them paying me a fee.

• None of the above.

In Jones v Padavatton, it was decided that?

• There was no intention and agreement was considered too vague to be considered

  contractual.

• There was an intention to create legal relations.

• There was a contract between the mother and child.

• None of the above.

In Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, the majority of the HOL held?

• Since Esso has increased sales of volume from the promotions, there is an intention to

  create legal relations.

• Since the coins were ‘going free’ and was of minimal value, there was no intention to create

  legal relations.

• Customers had a right to the coins even if Esso had ran out it as it an unilateral contract

  which customers had accepted.

• None of the above.