Causation

Causation

12th Grade

8 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Topic 3 Revision Quiz

Topic 3 Revision Quiz

12th Grade

12 Qs

2020 PMA - Wells & PD&T HSE Conversation

2020 PMA - Wells & PD&T HSE Conversation

KG - Professional Development

10 Qs

PTSD

PTSD

7th - 12th Grade

12 Qs

cars and loans

cars and loans

12th Grade

10 Qs

Tort Law

Tort Law

9th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

4/27 Alg 1 DLD

4/27 Alg 1 DLD

9th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

RYAP Unit 6 Quiz Practice

RYAP Unit 6 Quiz Practice

9th - 12th Grade

13 Qs

Disaster and Disaster Risk

Disaster and Disaster Risk

12th Grade

11 Qs

Causation

Causation

Assessment

Quiz

Other

12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Julia Jones

Used 8+ times

FREE Resource

8 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The test for factual causation is the ...............

the 'but for' test

the 'why not ' test

the damage test

the negligence test

2.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

For causation to be proved the defendant must have caused the damage and it must not be too ______.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The lead case on factual causation is ....

Barnett v Chelsea v Kensington Hospital MC.

Barnsley v London Hospital

Latimer v AEC

Watt v Herts CC

4.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

An intervening event that breaks the chain of causation is called a _____ _____ ____________.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The case of The Wagon Mound ( 1961) set out the test for

welding damage

fire damage

remoteness of damage

serious harm

6.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

When the court uses the test for remoteness of damage it is only the _____ of injury that must be foreseeable, no the way in which it occurred.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

An example of a case where the damage was NOT foreseeable was :

The Wagon Mound

Bradford v Robinson Rentals

Hughes v Lord Advocate

Doughty v Turner Asbestos

8.

FILL IN THE BLANK QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

For causation in negligence both factual and legal causation have to be proved, True or False ?