Search Header Logo

Section 2 Quiz

Authored by OLIVIA ROBINSON

English

8th Grade

CCSS covered

Used 39+ times

Section 2 Quiz
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

9 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Jack London’s point of view in “The Other Animals”?

A.   London asserts that he is not a “nature faker” because he tries to accurately portray a dog’s natural instincts in each of his books.

B.  London asserts that he is not a “nature faker” because he has a differing opinion than President Roosevelt.

C.  London asserts that he is not a “nature faker” because he exclusively focuses on “dog-heroes” instead of writing about other animals.

D.  London asserts that he is not a “nature faker” because he sees a clear difference between humans and dogs.

Answer explanation

This is correct. In paragraph 1, London claims that other authors have made dogs feel too human-like, but London’s dog characters are based on scientific understanding.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Then entered John Burroughs to clinch President Roosevelt’s judgments. In this alliance there is no difference of opinion . . . And first of all let Mr. Burroughs’s position be stated, and stated in his words.

 

“Why impute reason to an animal if its behavior can be explained on the theory of instinct?” Remember these words, for they will be referred to later. “A goodly number of persons seem to have persuaded themselves that animals do reason.” “But instinct suffices for the animals . . . they get along very well without reason.”

What is the meaning of the word suffices?

A.  is fair

B.  is hurtful

C.  is enough

D. is absurd

Answer explanation

This is correct. Burroughs claims that instinct alone is enough for dogs; they do not need reason.

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.4

CCSS.RI.8.4

CCSS.RI.9-10.4

CCSS.RL.8.4

CCSS.RL.9-10.4

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

. . . But let us see. Let us test Mr. Burroughs's test of reason and instinct. When I was a small boy I had a dog named Rollo. According to Mr. Burroughs, Rollo was an automaton, responding to external stimuli mechanically as directed by his instincts . . . Rollo and I did a great deal of rough romping. He chased me and I chased him . . . In the course of the play many variations arose. I would make believe to sit down and cry. All repentance and anxiety, he would wag his tail and lick my face, whereupon I would give him the laugh. He hated to be laughed at, and promptly he would spring for me with good-natured, menacing jaws, and the wild romp would go on. I had scored a point. Then he hit upon a trick. Pursuing him into the woodshed, I would find him in a far corner, pretending to sulk . . . But at first he fooled me. I thought I had somehow hurt his feelings and I came and knelt before him, petting him and speaking lovingly. Promptly, in a wild outburst, he was up and away, tumbling me over on the floor as he dashed out in a mad scurry around the yard. He had scored a point.

What is one way that Paragraph 5 makes London’s argument about not being a “nature faker” less effective?

A.  Paragraph 5 includes a personal anecdote, which can be influenced by the author’s own experience and interpretation.

B.  Paragraph 5 focuses too much on London’s pet and is a distraction from the author’s main argument.

C.  Paragraph 5 tells the story of a childhood dog rather than a current pet.

D.  Paragraph 5 takes an emotional approach which makes the author appear indecisive or weak.

Answer explanation

This is correct. London uses the personal anecdote in paragraph 5 to disprove what Burroughs was saying about London’s writing.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Jack London respond to Burroughs’s point of view?

A.  He agrees with some pieces and disputes other pieces of Burroughs’s point of view.

B.  He provides a personal anecdote to disprove Burroughs’s point of view.

C.  He contrasts Burroughs’s point of view with the opinion of another well-known source.

D.  He attacks Burroughs’s character and expresses doubt about his expertise

Answer explanation

This is correct. Use of an anecdote such as the one in paragraph 5 is risky in that the story may not be totally factual; one must assume that a self-reflective story about childhood may have some inaccuracies in it.

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.6

CCSS.RI.8.6

CCSS.RI.8.9

CCSS.RL.7.6

CCSS.RL.8.6

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 2 pts

Which quotations which show that London is objective in his descriptions of dogs?

“With a roar that was almost lion-like in its ferocity, he again hurled himself at the man.”

“Buck wondered where they went, for they never came back; but the fear of the future was strong upon him, and he was glad each time when he was not selected.”   

“That was fair of Francois, he decided, and the half-breed began his rise in Buck’s estimation.”

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RI.7.1

CCSS.RL.7.2

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 2 pts

Which quotations which show that London is objective in his descriptions of dogs?

“With a roar that was almost lion-like in its ferocity, he again hurled himself at the man.”

“Buck wondered where they went, for they never came back; but the fear of the future was strong upon him, and he was glad each time when he was not selected.”   

“That was fair of Francois, he decided, and the half-breed began his rise in Buck’s estimation.”

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RI.7.1

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.7.2

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 2 pts

Which quotations which show that London is objective in his descriptions of dogs?

“Buck wondered where they went, for they never came back; but the fear of the future was strong upon him, and he was glad each time when he was not selected.”   

“That was fair of Francois, he decided, and the half-breed began his rise in Buck’s estimation.”

 “But Buck was neither house-dog nor kennel dog . . . He plunged into the swimming tank or went hunting with the Judge’s sons; he escorted Mollie and Alice, the Judge’s daughters, on long twilight or early morning rambles . . .” 

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.2

CCSS.RI. 9-10.1

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?