HUMSS 2 (Philosophy Assessment 2)

HUMSS 2 (Philosophy Assessment 2)

12th Grade

50 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON

INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE HUMAN PERSON

12th Grade

50 Qs

H Phil - Descartes +

H Phil - Descartes +

3rd Grade - University

50 Qs

Pre-Socratic Philosophers

Pre-Socratic Philosophers

12th Grade

50 Qs

Understanding the Self

Understanding the Self

12th Grade

50 Qs

HUMSS 2 (Philosophy Assessment 2)

HUMSS 2 (Philosophy Assessment 2)

Assessment

Quiz

Philosophy

12th Grade

Medium

Created by

CHERRY MARAON

Used 17+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

50 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

It is a fallacy which suggests that unlikely or ridiculous outcomes are likely to happen when there’s just not enough evidence to think so.

Strawman

Hasty Generalization

Slippery Slope

Equivocation

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate. What fallacy is being defined in this statement?

Equivocation

Strawman

Slippery Slope

Hasty Generalization

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

The fallacy of attempting to induce acceptance of an unexamined or unproved conclusion by arousing the feelings, prejudices, or interests of political party, mob, or any large group of people.

Ad Hominem Fallacy

Ad Misericordiam Fallacy

Ad Populum Fallacy

Ad Baculum Fallacy

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

This fallacy is appeal to emotion. It is an argument used by people who want to win people over by manipulating their emotions. This is a favorite tactic of politicians during campaign period.

Ad Hominem Fallacy

Equivocation

Ad Baculum or Appeal to Force Fallacy

Ad Misericordiam or Appeal to Pity Fallacy

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

This is a fallacy of relevance where someone rejects or criticizes another person’s view on the basis of personal characteristics, background, physical appearance, or other features irrelevant to the argument at issue.

Ad Hominem Fallacy

Ad Misericordiam or Appeal to Pity

Appeal to People or Bandwagon

Ad Baculum of Appeal to Force

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What method of philosophizing that is an act of talking back and forth, disagreeing with one another, and arguing about contentious issues?

Socratic Method

Dialectic Method

Scientific Method

Historical Method

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

It is something that has actual and proven existence scientifically and spiritually regardless of one's opinion and beliefs. It is undisputed, objective, universal, constant, exact, and factual.

Truth

Fact

Opinion

Knowledge

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?