Valid or Invalid Syllogisms

Authored by Catherine McCaw

Social Studies

9th - 12th Grade

Used 89+ times

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

Content View

Student View

10 questions

Show all answers

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All dentists are doctors.
Some dentists are women.
Therefore, some women are doctors.

Valid

Invalid

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

Many patriots are American.
All heroes are patriots.
Therefore, all heroes are American.

Valid

Invalid

Answer explanation

It doesn't say all patriots are American.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All birds are animals.
No cats are birds.
Therefore, no cats are animals.

Valid

Invalid

Answer explanation

It doesn't say all animals are birds.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

No rationalists are empiricists.
Some rationalists are Europeans.
Therefore, some Europeans are not empiricists.

Valid

Invalid

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All pigeons are birds.
All pigeons are winged animals.
Therefore, all winged animals are birds.

Valid

Invalid

Answer explanation

(It doesn’t say all winged animals are pigeons)

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All ISIS members are terrorists.
Some ISIS members are not based in the Middle East.
Therefore, some based in the Middle East are not terrorists.

Valid

Invalid

Answer explanation

True, but invalid. The conclusion doesn't follow from the premises.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

Mammals have lungs.
Fish are mammals.
Therefore, fish have lungs.

Valid

Invalid

Answer explanation

Untrue, but valid.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Apple

Others

Already have an account?

Similar Resources on Wayground

10 questions

Election and Representation

Quiz

•

11th Grade

14 questions

Unit 2 American Colonies

Quiz

•

7th - 9th Grade

10 questions

Demand

Quiz

•

11th Grade

10 questions

1.1 & 1.2 - Scarcity and PPC

Quiz

•

9th - 12th Grade

12 questions

Political Parties, Elections

Quiz

•

10th Grade

13 questions

Obedience Theories

Quiz

•

12th Grade

15 questions

Social Psychology: Influence

Quiz

•

9th - 12th Grade

14 questions

Operant Conditioning

Quiz

•

11th - 12th Grade

Popular Resources on Wayground

15 questions

Fractions on a Number Line

Quiz

•

3rd Grade

20 questions

Equivalent Fractions

Quiz

•

3rd Grade

25 questions

Multiplication Facts

Quiz

•

5th Grade

29 questions

Alg. 1 Section 5.1 Coordinate Plane

Quiz

•

9th Grade

$fractions$

22 questions

fractions

Quiz

•

3rd Grade

11 questions

FOREST Effective communication

Lesson

•

20 questions

Main Idea and Details

Quiz

•

5th Grade

20 questions

Context Clues

Quiz

•

6th Grade

Discover more resources for Social Studies

17 questions

World War 2 (World History 25-26)

Quiz

•

9th Grade

15 questions

Unit 4 FA: Charlemagne, feudalism and catholic church

Quiz

•

10th Grade

20 questions

Unit 7.5 Imperial Rebellions

Quiz

•

10th Grade

15 questions

1920s Quizizz

Quiz

•

11th Grade

33 questions

Unit #2 PFL & Eco Exam (2024 Version)

Quiz

•

11th Grade

15 questions

SBAC Practice HSS26_Vasquez

Quiz

•

9th - 12th Grade

8 questions

1990's Review

Quiz

•

11th Grade

26 questions

US History Benchmark Review

Quiz

•

11th Grade

Valid or Invalid Syllogisms

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All dentists are doctors.
Some dentists are women.
Therefore, some women are doctors.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

Many patriots are American.
All heroes are patriots.
Therefore, all heroes are American.

It doesn't say all patriots are American.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All birds are animals.
No cats are birds.
Therefore, no cats are animals.

It doesn't say all animals are birds.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

No rationalists are empiricists.
Some rationalists are Europeans.
Therefore, some Europeans are not empiricists.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All pigeons are birds.
All pigeons are winged animals.
Therefore, all winged animals are birds.

(It doesn’t say all winged animals are pigeons)

True, but invalid. The conclusion doesn't follow from the premises.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

Mammals have lungs.
Fish are mammals.
Therefore, fish have lungs.

Untrue, but valid.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All Italians eat spaghetti.
Giovanni Rossi eats spaghetti.
Therefore Giovanni Rossi is Italian.

It doesn't say only Italians eat spaghetti. Rossi may well be Italian, but the argument is invalid.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

Some monks are Tibetans.
All Tibetans meditate.
Therefore some monks meditate.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All Alphas are Betas.
No Gammas are Betas.
Therefore no Gammas are Alphas.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Similar Resources on Wayground

Popular Resources on Wayground

Discover more resources for Social Studies

Valid or Invalid Syllogisms

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises: All dentists are doctors.Some dentists are women.Therefore, some women are doctors.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:Many patriots are American.All heroes are patriots.Therefore, all heroes are American.

It doesn't say all patriots are American.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:All birds are animals.No cats are birds.Therefore, no cats are animals.

It doesn't say all animals are birds.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:No rationalists are empiricists.Some rationalists are Europeans.Therefore, some Europeans are not empiricists.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:All pigeons are birds.All pigeons are winged animals.Therefore, all winged animals are birds.

(It doesn’t say all winged animals are pigeons)

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:All ISIS members are terrorists.Some ISIS members are not based in the Middle East.Therefore, some based in the Middle East are not terrorists.

True, but invalid. The conclusion doesn't follow from the premises.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:Mammals have lungs.Fish are mammals.Therefore, fish have lungs.

Untrue, but valid.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:All Italians eat spaghetti.Giovanni Rossi eats spaghetti.Therefore Giovanni Rossi is Italian.

It doesn't say only Italians eat spaghetti. Rossi may well be Italian, but the argument is invalid.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:Some monks are Tibetans.All Tibetans meditate. Therefore some monks meditate.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:All Alphas are Betas. No Gammas are Betas. Therefore no Gammas are Alphas.

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Similar Resources on Wayground

Popular Resources on Wayground

Discover more resources for Social Studies

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All dentists are doctors.
Some dentists are women.
Therefore, some women are doctors.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

Many patriots are American.
All heroes are patriots.
Therefore, all heroes are American.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All birds are animals.
No cats are birds.
Therefore, no cats are animals.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

No rationalists are empiricists.
Some rationalists are Europeans.
Therefore, some Europeans are not empiricists.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All pigeons are birds.
All pigeons are winged animals.
Therefore, all winged animals are birds.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

Mammals have lungs.
Fish are mammals.
Therefore, fish have lungs.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All Italians eat spaghetti.
Giovanni Rossi eats spaghetti.
Therefore Giovanni Rossi is Italian.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

Some monks are Tibetans.
All Tibetans meditate.
Therefore some monks meditate.

Is this syllogism valid or invalid? Remember: it doesn't have to be true to be valid. Valid means that the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises:

All Alphas are Betas.
No Gammas are Betas.
Therefore no Gammas are Alphas.