Premises and conclusion

"There's no way you'll get the job. The job ad says you need a high school diploma to apply." What premise is assumed, but not explicitly stated, in this argument?

• You don’t have a high school diploma.

• The job requires a high school diploma.

• The job requires a high school diploma.

"They're letting that criminal go on account of a technicality in the search warrant. I think that's just awful."

• This is an argument, and the conclusion is “They’re letting that criminal go on account of a technicality in the search warrant”.

• This is an argument, and the conclusion is “That’s just awful”.

• This isn’t an argument, it’s just a pair of statements. Neither is being offered as a reason to believe the other.

"John is a high school teacher, so he probably has a university degree." What premise is being assumed in this argument?

• All high school teachers have a university degree.

• Most high school teachers have a university degree.

• Most people with university degrees are high school teachers.

In ordinary language, the conclusion of an argument always comes after the premises.

• True

• False

If Hector hates jazz, then he shouldn't play it.

what's the conclusion?

• Hector shouldn't play jazz

• Hector hates jazz