Argumentative Vocab #2

formal reference to a research source acknowledging a person/author or work as a source of information

• Credible Source

• Citation

• Plagiarism

• Secondary Resource

Tags

CCSS.RI.6.1

CCSS.W.6.8

a list of the sources

• Plagarism

• Bias

• Paraphrase

• Works Cited

Tags

CCSS.W.6.8

a source that is accurate, based on fact, current, logically sound and written by a qualified author

• Faulty reasoning

• Reliable source

• Stereotype

• Secondary source

Tags

CCSS.RI.6.6

CCSS.RI.6.8

CCSS.W.6.8

those that have established a reputation for being trustworthy and accurate

• Credible source

• Primary source

• Rhetorical Devices

• Emotional Appeal

Tags

CCSS.W.6.1B

CCSS.W.6.8

a research source from the time in which an event being studied occurred

• Hyperbole

• Stereotype

• Primary source

• Secondary Source

Tags

CCSS.W.6.8

a source that is a step removed from the original accounts of an event or experience

• Secondary source

• Primary Source

• Reliable source

• Citation

Tags

CCSS.W.6.8

presenting another author’s words or ideas as one’s own without credit

• Bias

• Paraphrase

• Plagiarism

• Emotional Appeal

Tags

CCSS.W.6.8

restatement of something that has been read or heard, retaining the intended meaning of the original while using different words than the author

• Paraphrase

• Plagiarism

• Citation

• Rhetorical Devices

Tags

CCSS.SL.6.1D

CCSS.W.6.8

in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair

• Faulty reasoning

• Stereotype

• Loaded language

• Bias

Tags

CCSS.L.6.5C

CCSS.RI.6.4

CCSS.RI.6.6

CCSS.RI.6.8

a technique that an author or speaker uses to influence or persuade an audience

• Rhetorical Devices

• Emotional Appeal

• Figurative language

• Loaded language

Tags

CCSS.RI.6.4

CCSS.RI.6.6

CCSS.SL.6.3