Australian Consumer Law - Misleading and Deceptive Conduct

Australian Consumer Law - Misleading and Deceptive Conduct

11th Grade

12 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Consumer Protection

Consumer Protection

10th Grade - University

15 Qs

VOPA Quizz

VOPA Quizz

5th Grade - University

16 Qs

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

11th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

Court Case Review Quiz

Court Case Review Quiz

11th Grade

10 Qs

BTS

BTS

6th Grade - University

15 Qs

BTS ARMY Quiz

BTS ARMY Quiz

KG - University

10 Qs

Ministro de Educación

Ministro de Educación

9th - 11th Grade

10 Qs

Indian Removal Act

Indian Removal Act

5th - 11th Grade

9 Qs

Australian Consumer Law - Misleading and Deceptive Conduct

Australian Consumer Law - Misleading and Deceptive Conduct

Assessment

Quiz

Social Studies

11th Grade

Hard

Created by

James Gynther

Used 43+ times

FREE Resource

12 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

True/False: A corporation can only act through its directors?

True

False

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

Which is not considered to be 'in trade or commerce'?

Promotional material

Selling or distributing goods

Statements/advice provided for free

Advertising or promoting services

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which section would you use to sue personally for misleading conduct?

Section 18: Misleading and Deceptive Conduct

Section 29, 33, 34: False and Misleading Representations

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

Which section would you use to sue personally AND/OR report to the ACCC?

Section 18: Misleading and Deceptive Conduct

Section 29, 33, 34: False and Misleading Representations

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

What Case? Clinic promised successful cancer reversal treatment.

ACCC v Coles [2015]

Noone v Operation Smile [2012]

Concrete Constructions v Nelson (1990)

Campomar v Nike International (2000)

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

What Case? Branding similar to large company. Attempt to show that they had 'sponsorship'. This was untrue. Held to be misleading.

ACCC v Coles [2015]

Noone v Operation Smile [2012]

Concrete Constructions v Nelson (1990)

Campomar v Nike International (2000)

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

What Case? Internet package had find print which increased price hugely. Held to be misleading.

ACCC v TPG Internet [2013]

ACCC v Jones [2010]

ACCC v Channel Seven Brisbane [2009]

Google Inc v ACCC [2013]

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?