Supreme Court cases, many of them

Supreme Court cases, many of them

9th - 12th Grade

95 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

APUSH Unit 6: 1865-1898

APUSH Unit 6: 1865-1898

11th Grade

90 Qs

1789-1830's

1789-1830's

8th - 11th Grade

96 Qs

ધ્વનિ, અને બીજા ટોપિક વિજ્ઞાન( યાદવ મનમોહનસિંહ કેસરીસિંહ GES -2)

ધ્વનિ, અને બીજા ટોપિક વિજ્ઞાન( યાદવ મનમોહનસિંહ કેસરીસિંહ GES -2)

10th Grade

95 Qs

U.S. History EOC STAAR TEST REVIEW

U.S. History EOC STAAR TEST REVIEW

11th Grade

96 Qs

Sử Ôn VHPT

Sử Ôn VHPT

12th Grade

100 Qs

Texas History Final

Texas History Final

KG - University

96 Qs

The Civil Rights Movement

The Civil Rights Movement

12th Grade - University

98 Qs

US History Foundations Final Exam Review

US History Foundations Final Exam Review

11th Grade

100 Qs

Supreme Court cases, many of them

Supreme Court cases, many of them

Assessment

Quiz

Other Sciences, History

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Carl Rudd

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

95 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Established judicial review, set a precedent, federal gov. grows in power
Marbury v Madison
McCulloch v Maryland
Gibbons v Ogden
Fletcher v Peck

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Ruled the supreme court can declare a state law unconstitutional, fed. gov grows in power
Marbury v Madison
McCulloch v Maryland
Gibbons v Ogden
Fletcher v Peck

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

States can’t tax the federal government, federal gov. grows in power
Marbury v Madison
McCulloch v Maryland
Gibbons v Ogden
Fletcher v Peck

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Federal gov. can regulate interstate commerce, federal gov. grows in power
Marbury v Madison
McCulloch v Maryland
Gibbons v Ogden
Fletcher v Peck

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Ruled counsel must be provided for defendants if they request it
Gideon v Wainright
Escobedo v Illinois
Miranda v Arizona
Nix v Williams

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Ruled a defendant has a right to counsel during police interrogations
Gideon v Wainright
Escobedo v Illinois
Miranda v Arizona
Nix v Williams

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Ruled the defendant has the right to remain silent and counsel
Gideon v Wainright
Escobedo v Illinois
Miranda v Arizona
Nix v Williams

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?