
Laws of Logic
Authored by Brendan Reilly
Mathematics
8th - 12th Grade
CCSS covered
Used 28+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
30 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
p→q
q→r
∴p→r
Which law is modeled?
Law of Syllogism
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Shannon
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
p→q
p
∴q
Which law is modeled?
Law of Syllogism
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Shannon
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
(1) If you have a can opener, you can open a can.
(2) Jon has a can opener.
(3) John can open a can.
Is statement (3) logical given the Law of Detachment, Syllogism, Contrapositive, or is it invalid?
Law of Syllogism
Law of Detachment
Law of Syllogism
invalid
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
If a mineral is gypsum, it has a hardness of 2.
If a mineral has a hardness of 2, it can be scratched with a fingernail.
Using the Law of Syllogism, what logically comes next?
If a mineral can be scratched with a fingernail, then it is gypsum.
If a mineral is gypsum, it can be scratched with a fingernail.
If a mineral has a hardness of 2, then it can't be scratched with anything.
It can be scratched with a fingernail.
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
1 min • 1 pt
If an angle is 40⁰, then it is acute.
∠A is 40⁰.
Using the Law of Detachment, what is the logical statement to conclude?
∠A is complementary to ∠B
∠A is acute.
∠A is obtuse.
∠A is 40⁰
Tags
CCSS.HSG.CO.A.1
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
(1) If it is a rabbit, then it has long ears.
(2) Peter Cottontail has long ears.
(3) Peter Cottontail is a rabbit.
Is statement (3) logical given the Law of Detachment, Syllogism, Contrapositive, or is it invalid?
Law of Syllogism
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
invalid
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
(1) If you drive safely, then the life you save may be your own.
(2) AJ drives safely.
(3) The life AJ saves may be his own.
Is statement (3) logical given the Law of Detachment, Syllogism, Contrapositive, or is it invalid?
Law of Detachment
Law of Syllogism
Law of Contrapositive
invalid
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?