Search Header Logo

Laws of Logic

Authored by Brendan Reilly

Mathematics

8th - 12th Grade

CCSS covered

Used 28+ times

Laws of Logic
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

30 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

p→q
q→r
∴p→r
Which law is modeled?

Law of Syllogism
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Shannon

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

p→q
p
∴q
Which law is modeled?

Law of Syllogism
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Shannon

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

(1) If you have a can opener, you can open a can.
(2) Jon has a can opener.
(3) John can open a can.
Is statement (3) logical given the Law of Detachment, Syllogism, Contrapositive, or is it invalid?

Law of Syllogism
Law of Detachment
Law of Syllogism
invalid

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

If a mineral is gypsum, it has a hardness of 2.
If a mineral has a hardness of 2, it can be scratched with a fingernail.
Using the Law of Syllogism, what logically comes next?

If a mineral can be scratched with a fingernail, then it is gypsum.
If a mineral is gypsum, it can be scratched with a fingernail.
If a mineral has a hardness of 2, then it can't be scratched with anything.
It can be scratched with a fingernail.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

If an angle is 40⁰, then it is acute.
∠A is 40⁰.
Using the Law of Detachment, what is the logical statement to conclude?

∠A is complementary to ∠B
∠A is acute.
∠A is obtuse.
∠A is 40⁰

Tags

CCSS.HSG.CO.A.1

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

(1)  If it is a rabbit, then it has long ears.
(2)  Peter Cottontail has long ears.
(3)  Peter Cottontail is a rabbit.
Is statement (3) logical given the Law of Detachment, Syllogism, Contrapositive, or is it invalid?

Law of Syllogism
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
invalid

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

(1) If you drive safely, then the life you save may be your own.
(2) AJ drives safely.
(3)  The life AJ saves may be his own.
Is statement (3) logical given the Law of Detachment, Syllogism, Contrapositive, or is it invalid?

Law of Detachment
Law of Syllogism
Law of Contrapositive
invalid

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?