Berlin Conference / Tools of Imperialism

Open Ended

Why do you think no African representatives were present at the Berlin Conference?

Multiple Choice

What was the significance of the Berlin Conference?

• It was a meeting to discuss European trade policies.

• It was a conference to divide Africa among European powers.

• It was a gathering to promote African independence.

• It was a summit to discuss global peace.

Multiple Choice

What was the primary motivation behind King Leopold II's actions in Africa?

• Genuine humanitarian efforts to end slavery

• A personal quest to establish his own imperial power and wealth

•  Diplomatic cooperation with African leaders

• Expanding Belgian national territory

Multiple Choice

Which European leader invited others to the Berlin Conference and why?

• King Leopold, to expand his territory

• Otto von Bismarck, to maintain peace in Europe

• Queen Victoria, to promote trade

• Napoleon III, to end slavery

Multiple Choice

The Berlin Conference resulted in an act that did three things. Which of the following was NOT one of them?

• Recognizing King Leopold's territory

• Setting up a way for Europeans to claim territory

• Ending all territorial claims in Africa

• Recognizing existing territorial claims

Multiple Choice

How did the conference demonstrate European attitudes toward African societies?

• Respectful recognition of local governance

• Collaborative partnership with African leaders

• A racist assumption that African lands were "unclaimed"

• Genuine interest in cultural exchange

Open Ended

What was Menelik II's response to the Berlin Conference, and how did he express his stance?

Multiple Choice

Which European country had the most colonies in Africa during the era of New Imperialism?

• Belgium

• France

• Britain

• Germany