12 Angry Men Act 2 Flashcard

Front

How does the setting of the jury room contribute to the tension in Act 2?

Back

The cramped and stuffy setting of the jury room creates a sense of confinement and pressure, heightening the emotional intensity and conflict among the jurors.

Front

What role does Juror 8 play in Act 2?

Back

Juror 8 acts as the protagonist, presenting reasonable doubts and alternative perspectives that influence the other jurors to reconsider their initial judgments.

Front

What is the significance of the secret ballot in Act 2?

Back

The secret ballot allows jurors to vote without fear of judgment, promoting honesty and encouraging open discussion about their opinions.

Front

What evidence challenges the guilt of the defendant in Act 2?

Back

Testimony of a witness and new information that casts doubt on initial eyewitness accounts challenge the defendant's guilt.

Front

Why does Juror 9 suggest the old man may have lied in his testimony?

Back

Juror 9 suggests the old man may have lied because he relates to him, feeling that the old man might have wanted to feel important for the first time in a long while.

Front

What is the primary theme of '12 Angry Men'?

Back

The primary theme is the importance of reasonable doubt in the justice system and the moral responsibility of jurors.

Front

How does group dynamics affect the decision-making process in Act 2?

Back

Group dynamics create pressure to conform, leading some jurors to change their votes based on the influence of others, highlighting the complexities of collective decision-making.

Front

What role does prejudice play in the jurors' deliberations?

Back

Prejudice affects the jurors' perceptions and decisions, as some jurors allow their biases to cloud their judgment regarding the defendant's guilt.

Front

How does Juror 3's personal experiences influence his perspective?

Back

Juror 3's personal experiences with his son lead him to project his anger and frustration onto the case, affecting his objectivity.

Front

What is the impact of Juror 8's insistence on discussing the evidence?

Back

Juror 8's insistence on discussing the evidence encourages critical thinking and thorough examination of the case, fostering a more just deliberation.