Analysing and evaluating evidence

Front

What is anecdotal evidence?

Back

Anecdotal evidence is based on personal accounts or individual stories rather than on scientific data or statistical analysis.

Front

Why is anecdotal evidence often considered unreliable?

Back

Anecdotal evidence is often considered unreliable because it is not representative of a larger population and can be biased.

Front

What does it mean to evaluate evidence?

Back

Evaluating evidence means assessing the credibility, relevance, and sufficiency of the information presented to support a claim.

Front

What is the importance of using judgment when evaluating evidence?

Back

Using judgment is important when evaluating evidence because it allows for reasoned responses and critical thinking about the information.

Front

Can there be right or wrong answers when evaluating evidence?

Back

No, when evaluating evidence, there are often no definitive right or wrong answers; it involves interpretation and reasoning.

Front

What is a fact?

Back

A fact is a statement that can be proven true or false based on objective evidence.

Front

How can you determine if evidence is sufficient to support a claim?

Back

To determine if evidence is sufficient, ask whether the evidence provided fully supports the claim being made.

Front

What is the role of critical thinking in evaluating evidence?

Back

Critical thinking helps individuals analyze, interpret, and assess the validity of evidence before forming conclusions.

Front

What is the difference between qualitative and quantitative evidence?

Back

Qualitative evidence is descriptive and subjective, while quantitative evidence is numerical and objective.

Front

What is the significance of context in evaluating evidence?

Back

Context is significant because it helps to understand the circumstances surrounding the evidence, which can affect its interpretation.