Logical Fallacies vs. Evidence

Front

Rejecting, omitting, or ignoring evidence of an opposing argument in order to strengthen your argument.

Back

Stacking the deck

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.7.5

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.8.8

Front

This is a conclusion that if A happens, then eventually through a series of small steps, Z will happen. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either.

Back

Slippery-slope

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

Front

This conclusion occurs when one rushes to a conclusion without getting all of the facts.

Back

Generalization

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.1

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.9-10.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Front

Fallacies are flaws in reasoning because they...

Back

lack credible evidence to support a claim.

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.1

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.8.1

Front

This is an attack on an opponent's character rather than his claim or argument.

Back

Ad hominem

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.1

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

Front

This type of appeal attempts to persuades others to think the same way as the majority, or a group of people think, in order to persuade one to think the same way.

Back

Bandwagon

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.7.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

Front

This is a diversionary tactic that introduces an irrelevant topic to an argument in order to distract readers and listeners from the original issue.

Back

Red herring

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

Front

This fallacy occurs when someone takes another person’s claim and attempts to distort or exaggerate it in some kind of extreme way to make it easier to attack the argument.

Back

Straw man

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.5

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

Front

This fallacy occurs when an opponent restates an argument rather than proving it.

Back

Circular reasoning

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

Front

This is a fallacy that assumes that if 'A' occurred after 'B' then 'B' must have been the cause of 'A.'

Back

Post-hoc

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.7.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1